Will the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?
5.0 pts (24h)US PoliticsOne-OffWeather1yBefore Aug 1, 2028
KalshiCheck availabilityKYC requiredVerified resolution dataWell calibratedSelected book midpoint
Yes · —
Loading selected book…
—
Stored price
Yes 61.5%
Yes 61.5%Market quality
≤49 / 100
Low quality24h Volume
$1.2
Open interest
$2.1K
Low open interestBid / Ask
— / —
YesSpread
—
Market data
Updated 23 minutes ago
Jul 22, 26, 8:59 PM UTCAug 1, 28, 2:00 PM UTC
Chart and changes show stored historical probabilities, not the selected live book.
Trends
Selected row: book midpoint. Other rows: stored references, possibly normalized; 24h changes use stored history.
Venue terms
Source: Kalshi
Informational venue terms only; CoinRithm paper trading uses its own rules.
- Early close:
- Yes
- Settlement timer:
- 30m (informational)
Market depth · Yes
Loading selected book…
—
Related Markets
Related questions for context, not a comparison of equivalent contracts.
Will SCOTUS rule for DHS on third-country deportations?
KalshiWill SCOTUS let people seek green cards after their asylum is terminated?
KalshiWill SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?
KalshiWill SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?
KalshiWill SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?
KalshiWill SCOTUS bar unpled affirmative defenses at summary judgment?
KalshiRules
This outcome's exact rule is not available.
Settles via:Supreme Court
- The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that federal law precludes the state-law claims at issue seeking relief for injuries allegedly caused by the effects of interstate and international greenhouse-gas emissions on the global climate, after Issuance and before August 1, 2028. A ruling only that the Court has statutory and Article III jurisdiction does not satisfy the criterion. The market resolves to No if the Court rules that federal law does not preclude those claims, holds that it lacks jurisdiction, dismisses the writ as improvidently granted, or otherwise dismisses or remands the case without ruling on the merits described above.
Rules for each outcome
- Yes
- This outcome's exact rule is not available.
- No
- This outcome's exact rule is not available.
