Will SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?
US PoliticsOne-OffTech1yBefore Aug 1, 2028
KalshiCheck availabilityKYC requiredVerified resolution dataWell calibratedSelected book midpoint
Yes · —
Loading selected book…
—
Stored price
Yes 77%
Yes 77%Market quality
32 / 100
Low quality24h Volume
—
Open interest
$0
Open interest unknownBid / Ask
— / —
YesSpread
—
Market data
Updated 9 minutes ago
Jul 23, 26, 2:00 PM UTCAug 1, 28, 2:00 PM UTC
Chart and changes show stored historical probabilities, not the selected live book.
Trends
Selected row: book midpoint. Other rows: stored references, possibly normalized; 24h changes use stored history.
Venue terms
Source: Kalshi
Informational venue terms only; CoinRithm paper trading uses its own rules.
- Early close:
- Yes
- Settlement timer:
- 30m (informational)
Market depth · Yes
Loading selected book…
—
Related Markets
Related questions for context, not a comparison of equivalent contracts.
Will SCOTUS rule for DHS on third-country deportations?
KalshiWill SCOTUS overturn or narrow Stinson deference to federal sentencing-guideline commentary?
KalshiWill SCOTUS let district courts hear constitutional challenges to veterans-benefits laws?
KalshiWill the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?
KalshiWill SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?
KalshiWill SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?
KalshiRules
This outcome's exact rule is not available.
Settles via:Supreme Court
- The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028. A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes. A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No. If the case is dismissed, found improvidently granted, or remanded without resolving the granted question on the merits, the market resolves to No.
Rules for each outcome
- Yes
- This outcome's exact rule is not available.
- No
- This outcome's exact rule is not available.
