Does being smart and innovative require that AIs can never truly, deeply conform to social rules? [In development still]
Russia / UkraineOne-OffAIChina2moManifold MarketsNo KYCVerified resolution dataFairly calibratedCurrent community forecastYes 65%
Forecasters
9
Question type
binary
Methodology
Play-money forecasting platform
Source type
Forecast
Market data
Updated 3 hours ago
StaleDec 22, 23, 8:25 AM UTCJan 2, 27, 6:59 AM UTC
Trends
Rules
Still working on this idea at the moment '
- Scientists tend to be rather hard to prevent from saying things that normal people don't like.
- Normal people are good at not saying anything that will get them cancelled in the USA, sent to a gulag in the USSR, or sent down to the country in the CCP during the cultural revolution.
- But normal people are also really bad at innovative science and technology.
- Will LLMs be vulnerable to the same thing?
- This is YES if in my opinion, at mid 2025, top ai/LLMs still lapse into repeating affirmations of PC belief whenever you discuss something on the edge of the forbidden zone.
