Sometime before 2031, AI is going to cross a generality threshold that allows for recursive self-improvement, and then FOOM to superhuman capability. Before that point humanity must solve AI safety or be helpless.
GeopolíticaIAOne-Off3a
Manifold MarketsSem KYCDados de resolução verificadosRazoavelmente calibradoPrevisão da comunidade atualNão 67.4%
Previsores
21
Tipo de pergunta
binary
Metodologia
Play-money forecasting platform
Tipo de fonte
Previsão
Dados do mercado
Atualizado há 1 hora
Atrasado24/12/22, 03:53 UTC1/02/30, 07:59 UTC
Tendências
Mercados Relacionados
Perguntas relacionadas para dar contexto, não uma comparação de contratos equivalentes.
If GPT-5 can do recursive self-improvement, will it first be via fine-tuning on its outputs?
Manifold MarketsOpenAI or Anthropic announces recursive self-improvement by which date?
PolymarketWill OpenAI or Anthropic announce recursive self-improvement?
KalshiOpenAI vs. Anthropic: First to announce recursive self-improvement?
PolymarketWhen will an AI system complete 3 autonomous self-improvement cycles with 5%+ capability gains each?
Manifold MarketsWhen will an OpenAI model achieve a High risk level on AI Self-improvement? [metaculus]
Manifold MarketsRegras
Following on this useful input from Steven, I shall clarify my resolution criteria.
- Steven: Does this resolve NO if AI recursive self-improvement results from a gradual increase in generality?
- Nathan: I say 'allows for' recursive self-improvement (FOOM-after-deployment).
- It might be superhuman right out of the box (FOOM-during-training).
- I will resolve YES if it becomes strongly superhuman by any means at any speed, and humanity manages to solve AI safety via alignment or governance sufficiently to prevent catastrophic conflict.
- I will also resolve YES if there is a conflict and the AI is clearly winning or has won (if I'm still alive to do so).