Will Google stick to the same red lines as Anthropic for the US military by EOY 2026?
GeopolitikOne-OffKITechnik2Mon
Manifold MarketsKein KYCVerifizierte AuflösungsdatenOrdentlich kalibriertAktuelle Community-PrognoseNein 90.6%
Prognostiker
21
Fragetyp
binary
Methodik
Play-money forecasting platform
Quellentyp
Prognose
Marktdaten
Aktualisiert vor 14 Stunden
Veraltet27. Feb. 26, 23:39 UTC31. Dez. 26, 23:59 UTC
Trends
Verwandte Märkte
Verwandte Fragen als Kontext, kein Vergleich gleichwertiger Kontrakte.
Will OpenAI stick to its commitment to the same red lines as Anthropic for the US military using its AI by EOY 2026?
Manifold MarketsWill "Global Call for AI Red Lines - Signed by Nobe..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
Manifold MarketsDario Amodei out as Anthropic CEO this year?
Kalshi🚩What red lines will Trump cross by the end of 2028? [ADD RESPONSES]
Manifold MarketsUS military action against Cuba by which date?
PolymarketWill Iran strike US military base at least once before November?
Manifold MarketsRegeln
More than 100 Google A.I. employees sent a letter to Jeff Dean, a chief scientist, opposing Gemini’s use for U.S. surveillance and some autonomous weapons. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/26/technology/google-deepmind-letter-pentagon.html
- At the same time, Google is already providing some AI services to the US military, although it has not yet been approved for classified use https://breakingdefense.com/2026/02/pentagon-cto-says-its-not-democratic-for-anthropic-to-limit-military-use-of-claude-ai/
- If Google sticks to both elements of Anthropic's commitment, of not permitting usage of its AI for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons by the US military, by the end of 2026, this will resolve to Yes.
- Note that if Google chooses to end its contract with the US military, this will still resolve to Yes, because presumably the is the same red lines as for Anthropic.
- Note that if they do strike a deal and the military somehow does use Google's Gemini or other AI tools for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons without Google's explicit approval, such as through subterfuge, fudging definitions, or the Defense Procurement Act, this still resolves to Yes.
- The No condition has to be about Google explicitly permitting the US military to use its AI for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons.