What is the current price of Impossible Cloud Network Token?
The current price of Impossible Cloud Network Token is $0.2025 with a 19.26% change in the last 24 hours.
Supply and ATH/ATL data provided by CoinGecko
Hyperliquid perpetuals only. One snapshot every 5 minutes, up to 20 returned price levels per side. Liquidity beyond those levels is unknown. This is not a liquidation heatmap or a fill estimate.
Loading recorded snapshots…
Prices and notionals are USD-equivalent venue units, with USDC collateral. No currency conversion is applied. Notional = venue price × base-asset size. Contract specifications
Derivatives and mapped ecosystem data, with source timings and coverage.
Impossible Cloud Network is a decentralized cloud infrastructure protocol, and ICNT is the token that coordinates it. The aim is stated plainly in its documentation: to build "a fully open, multi-service, permissionless and composable cloud infrastructure that integrates storage, compute, and networking at scale." In practice, independent hardware providers contribute enterprise-grade servers, a separate network of verifier nodes continuously proves those servers are performing as promised, and builders book capacity and pay for it in ICNT.
ICN sits in the decentralized physical infrastructure network category but differs from most of it in one important way: the hardware is enterprise equipment run by professional providers rather than spare consumer capacity, and the front-end product is an S3-compatible object storage service that ordinary businesses can adopt without knowing a blockchain is involved.
ICNT is an ERC-20 token deployed on both Base and Ethereum. Live on-chain reads confirm the name "Impossible Cloud Network Token" and symbol "ICNT" at 0xE0Cd4cAcDdcBF4f36e845407CE53E87717b6601d on Base and 0xe5e0b73380181273abCfD88695F52C4D0C825661 on Ethereum. The protocol's smart contracts themselves are deployed on Base.
Official sources:
The commercial parent, Impossible Cloud, was founded in Hamburg, Germany in late 2021 by Dr. Kai Wawrzinek and Dr. Christian Kaul. Wawrzinek had previously founded Goodgame Studios, a gaming company that went public on Nasdaq, an unusual background for a cloud infrastructure project that helps explain the emphasis on shipping a paying commercial product before decentralizing it.
The protocol rolled out in stages. The HyperNode verification layer went live on 13 May 2025, and mainnet plus the ICNT token generation event followed on 3 July 2025, moving coordination and settlement fully on-chain. Around that launch window, ICN announced a 34 million dollar investment led by NGP Capital, an investor that had previously backed Xiaomi and Helium, at a reported 470 million dollar valuation, with the token distributed through several major exchanges.
The protocol lifecycle runs in four stages, each with a distinct actor:
Provisioning A Hardware Provider registers a physical server, called a ScalerNode, under a specific hardware class and installs the Daemon, the diagnostic agent that collects and reports telemetry. Registration specifies hardware class, geographic location following ISO 3166, capacity, the share of rewards passed to delegators, a reservation price in ICNT per unit of capacity per day, and a maximum booking duration. The provider must also post collateral in ICNT.
Resourcing Builders book capacity through the Console in whole ScalerNode units within a cluster, a logical grouping of nodes of the same hardware class inside a region. The protocol assigns the first available node that satisfies the request. Minimum booking duration is 90 days.
Monitoring HyperNodes, independent verifier nodes, run cryptographically signed challenges against the Daemons on a fixed schedule. Time is divided into eras of roughly one hour, and each ScalerNode sends one challenge to every active HyperNode per era. Both sides submit reports.
On-chain settlement Reports land in the Satellite Network, a data availability layer that keeps challenge evidence retrievable off-chain for a set period so anyone can verify a result. A concise version goes on-chain, and the smart contracts settle rewards and penalties from it.
This split matters. The party providing the hardware is not the party attesting to its performance, and the evidence for every attestation is publicly retrievable. That is ICN's answer to what it calls the DePIN verification problem.
ICNT has a hard cap of 700,000,000 tokens. The documentation is explicit that inflation is zero, that no additional ICNT will ever be minted, and that all rewards and emissions draw from the fixed supply and a Reward Reserve rather than from new issuance.
The token has three core functions:
Collateral is subject to slashing when a provider fails to meet service level requirements, and external delegators can stake ICNT behind a provider to share in that provider's rewards.
Most decentralized storage networks start from the protocol and hope customers arrive. ICN started from a working commercial cloud business with S3-compatible object storage and paying customers, then decentralized the supply side underneath it. That ordering shows up throughout the design: booking durations measured in months, standardized hardware classes so capacity is genuinely interchangeable, and regional clusters that respect data locality and regional regulation. The verification architecture is the other distinctive piece, separating the hardware layer from an independent verifier network and publishing challenge evidence to a retrievable availability layer rather than relying on self-reported uptime.
Compared with Filecoin and Arweave, ICN is not primarily a permanent or content-addressed storage protocol. It sells conventional S3-compatible object storage with enterprise service expectations, and the blockchain handles allocation, collateral and settlement rather than the data path itself.
Compared with Storj, which also offers S3-compatible decentralized storage, the main difference is the hardware profile and the explicit verifier network: ICN targets enterprise-grade servers under professional operators. Compared with GPU-focused networks such as Akash or Aethir, ICN's live hardware class today is storage, with compute and networking described as the direction of travel rather than as shipped classes, a distinction worth holding onto when reading marketing copy about a full cloud stack.
Security operates on several fronts. Economically, Hardware Providers post ICNT collateral that can be slashed if they miss service levels, so poor performance has a direct cost. Structurally, the party that verifies performance is separate from the party providing it, and a HyperNode cannot operate at all without a staked ICN Link, which gives verifiers their own skin in the game.
Verifiability comes from the challenge and reporting design. Each availability challenge produces signed reports from both sides, recording the originator, software version, era ID, node identifiers and signatures, published to the Satellite Network so a claim can be checked against the underlying evidence rather than taken on trust.
At the contract level, ICN publishes third-party audits, including reviews of ICN Protocol v5.0 and v5.1 by Cantina and Spearbit, v4.0 by Oak Security, and separate audits of the ICN Link and Fairdrop contracts. Settlement runs on Base, so the protocol inherits that network's security properties and its dependencies.
DePIN has struggled with a simple question: can decentralized infrastructure actually serve customers who care about service levels rather than about decentralization? ICN answers with enterprise hardware, standardized capacity classes, a verifier network with its own stake, and a commercial storage product that already competes on ordinary cloud terms. Whether or not it wins share from established providers, it is one of the clearer worked examples of building a decentralized network around existing paying demand rather than the other way around.
ICNT trades on centralized exchanges and on decentralized exchanges on Base and Ethereum. Availability and pairs vary by jurisdiction and change over time, so check with the venue before trading.
ICNT was distributed through several major exchanges at launch and is commonly available on:
ICNT can be held:
Base and Ethereum hold separate deployments with different contract addresses, and ICN documents a bridging route between them. Confirm the network before sending, and use the documented bridge rather than transferring directly between chains.
You can compare ICNT with related infrastructure networks on Coinrithm:
Track Impossible Cloud Network Token live price, chart, market cap, and volume in real time. Practice mock trading and demo trading for Impossible Cloud Network Token on CoinRithm before using real money.
Use a crypto paper trading account to demo trade Impossible Cloud Network Token with real-time prices, AI trade feedback, and trading leagues. Test strategies, learn risk management, and build confidence before trading Impossible Cloud Network Token with real money.
Read the complete paper trading guideThe current price of Impossible Cloud Network Token is $0.2025 with a 19.26% change in the last 24 hours.
The daily trading volume is $7,102,935 representing a 13.62% change in the past 24 hours.
The market capitalization of Impossible Cloud Network Token is $51,243,948, ranking #300 globally.
The fully diluted valuation (FDV) of Impossible Cloud Network Token is $141,778,240, calculated assuming the maximum supply of 700,000,000 ICNT is in circulation.
Circulating: 253,006,129. Total: 700,000,000. Max: 700,000,000.
In the last 24 hours, Impossible Cloud Network Token traded between a low of $0.1543 and a high of $0.2124.
ICNT/USDTTether USDT0.2025 USDT
Upbit lists six altcoins—CYS, ICNT, XAN, EDEN, AIOZ, ALLO—with BTC and USDT pairs, exposing South Korean traders to DePIN compute, cross-chain OS, and AI.
PancakeSwap just added ICNT/USDC liquidity, giving traders straightforward access to Impossible Cloud Network's decentralized AI computing power.
