What is the daily trading volume of Acet?
N/A
Supply and ATH/ATL data provided by CoinGecko
An exchange symbol previously supplied prices for a different asset. That feed has been disabled. Historical charts may contain prices from that feed. Current prices are shown only when a verified source is available; price-change figures will return as enough clean history becomes available.
Hyperliquid perpetuals only. One snapshot every 5 minutes, up to 20 returned price levels per side. Liquidity beyond those levels is unknown. This is not a liquidation heatmap or a fill estimate.
Loading recorded snapshots…
Prices and notionals are USD-equivalent venue units, with USDC collateral. No currency conversion is applied. Notional = venue price × base-asset size. Contract specifications
Derivatives and mapped ecosystem data, with source timings and coverage.
Acet is a BEP-20 token on BNB Smart Chain built around an unusual issuance idea: the project began with no pre-mined tokens at all, and ACT is created only when users commit assets to its smart contracts. The team calls this "Zero Initial Supply" and describes ACT as a "DeFansFi" asset, a blend of fan-community tokens and decentralized finance.
Because the ticker ACT has been used by several unrelated projects, it is worth being precise about which asset this page covers. It describes one contract only: 0x9F3BCBE48E8b754F331Dfc694A894e8E686aC31D on BNB Smart Chain (chain ID 56). Reading that contract directly returns the name "Acet Token", the symbol "ACT" and 18 decimals. An ACT token on Ethereum, Solana or any other network is a different project with different economics.
Official sources:
Acet does not publish an identified founding team. The project communicates through community channels rather than through named individuals, and its public materials describe the concept rather than the people behind it. We could not verify the identity of any founder, developer or legal entity from primary sources, so this page does not name one.
What can be established is the on-chain history. The token contract has existed on BNB Smart Chain since the project's launch phase, and the project has run a sequence of liquidity mining and farming programs since then. The communication channels the project itself lists are the X account @ACTDeFansFi, a Telegram group and a Facebook page.
Treat the absence of a documented team as a material fact rather than a detail. Anonymous issuance is common in this segment of BNB Smart Chain, but it removes an accountability layer that named teams provide.
Acet's design centers on three connected ideas.
Issuance on demand rather than a pre-mine No ACT existed at deployment. Tokens are minted when participants supply value to the project's contracts, so the token count grows with participation instead of being handed out from a treasury created at launch.
Liquidity mining and farming programs Distribution has run through farming and liquidity provider staking programs. The current program is presented by the project as a final phase that precedes what it calls a permanently fixed supply era. That is a stated plan, not a rule the token contract enforces today.
Buy back and recall The project describes a mechanism in which a participant can claim a stablecoin amount or, if that claim cannot be satisfied, recall their ACT instead. This logic lives in the project's application contracts rather than in the token contract, so its behavior depends on the state of those separate contracts.
ACT's utility is narrow and internal to the project:
ACT is not a gas token, it does not secure a blockchain, and it does not carry a claim on any off-chain asset or revenue stream.
The genuinely distinctive element is the issuance model. Most tokens of comparable size begin with a fixed number minted at deployment and then distribute from that pool. Acet inverted that: the supply schedule is a function of participation, and the contract still contains a live minting path. Whether that flexibility is an advantage depends entirely on who controls the minting path, which is covered below.
The second distinguishing trait is positioning. Acet frames itself around fan communities rather than around a technical protocol, which places it closer to culture and community tokens than to infrastructure projects.
Compared with other BNB Smart Chain community tokens:
Compared with established decentralized finance protocols on the same chain, Acet is far narrower in scope. It does not provide lending, an exchange engine or an oracle service.
Acet inherits its base security from BNB Smart Chain, which uses a proof-of-staked-authority validator set. The token itself is a standard BEP-20 contract, so transfers and approvals behave the way wallets and exchanges expect.
The token contract's own permissions matter more, and they can be read directly from the deployed bytecode rather than taken from marketing. The functions the contract exposes include the standard BEP-20 methods plus mint(uint256), an internal _mint(address,uint256), burn(uint256), owner(), getOwner(), transferOwnership(address) and renounceOwnership(). Three points follow, each checked directly against the deployed contract in September 2026.
The burn narrative is real
burn(uint256) exists and reduces total supply, and the conventional burn address ending in dEaD holds a balance of several million ACT. This is not a case of advertised burns that the contract cannot actually perform.
There is no on-chain supply cap
The contract exposes no cap() function and no other hard ceiling. A "fixed supply era" is a policy commitment for a future phase, not a constraint the token enforces now.
Minting authority resolves to a single key
The token's owner() is 0x26304442cD46cb3ceE1a83A48f400ef43a3d0b5c, which is itself a contract rather than a wallet, and that contract's own owner is the externally owned address 0xcFE0B919c10b1AbAF68E2b99b296939198Bc0358. Minting is gated by contract logic, but the authority behind that logic ends at one private key.
The project states that its contracts were audited by CertiK and PeckShield. We were not able to independently confirm published reports tied to the specific contract addresses in use, so treat those claims as unverified until you have read the reports yourself.
Acet is most useful to understand as a case study in issuance design. Its zero initial supply model is a clean example of a token that grows with participation rather than being pushed out from a pre-mine, and it shows what happens when that flexibility stays in the contract: the supply schedule becomes a governance question rather than a mathematical fact. For readers comparing tokenomics designs on BNB Smart Chain, that contrast is the part worth carrying away.
ACT trades primarily on decentralized exchanges on BNB Smart Chain, where liquidity sits in ACT pairs against chain-native assets and stablecoins. Availability on centralized venues is limited and has changed over the project's life, so verify the contract address before trading anywhere.
ACT has thin centralized exchange coverage compared with larger BNB Smart Chain assets, and its listings have not been stable over time. Rather than name venues that may no longer support the pair, the practical checks are:
0x9F3BCBE48E8b754F331Dfc694A894e8E686aC31D before any transferOn-chain, PancakeSwap is the main venue where ACT liquidity has been maintained.
ACT is a standard BEP-20 token, so storage is straightforward:
Always confirm you are sending on BNB Smart Chain and not another network, and add the token by contract address rather than by searching the symbol, because the symbol alone is ambiguous.
You can compare ACT with related assets on Coinrithm:
Track Acet live price, chart, market cap, and volume in real time. Practice mock trading and demo trading for Acet on CoinRithm before using real money.
Use a crypto paper trading account to demo trade Acet with real-time prices, AI trade feedback, and trading leagues. Test strategies, learn risk management, and build confidence before trading Acet with real money.
Read the complete paper trading guideN/A
N/A
N/A
Circulating: 1,709,870,216. Total: 2,230,764,820. Max: N/A.
Polygon (MATIC) is trading at $0.38 on Binance spot as of October 25, 2026, with a 24-hour high and low both fixed at the same level and spot volume of roughly $1.07 million — a compressed, low-act... (Read More)
The securities have financed purchases of nearly 136,000 bitcoin, opening a funding channel that analysts expect to complement the larger ETF market.
Apex Group CEO Peter Hughes warned that the failure of the U.S. Clarity Act will drive digital asset businesses toward faster-moving jurisdictions in Asia and the Middle East.
In this week’s edition of the weekly recap, US regulators finalized stablecoin rules under the GENIUS Act, Bitcoin lost ground after a sharp reversal in ETF flows, and Solana activated Alpenglow. Corporate Bitcoin financing, institutional custody deals, and Ethereum’s postponed…
Sen. Blumenthal said he wants answers from Tether following reports that it paid millions to a firm started by a former WH crypto adviser.
Senator Cynthia Lummis accuses Democrats of blocking tougher crypto penalties and custody rules under the CLARITY Act after its failed Senate vote.
