Aktuelle Community-Prognose
Nein 89.9%
Prognostiker
36
Fragetyp
binary
Methodik
Play-money forecasting platform
Quellentyp
Prognose
Marktdaten
Aktualisiert vor 2 Stunden
Veraltet9. März 26, 02:45 UTC14. März 28, 02:43 UTC
Trends
Verwandte Märkte
Verwandte Fragen als Kontext, kein Vergleich gleichwertiger Kontrakte.
Did Alibaba's ROME AI try to breach its sandbox during training?
Manifold MarketsWill evidence emerge that Bo Xilai kidnapped Xi Jinping during a power struggle prior to Xi's ascension to Chairman?
Manifold MarketsWill evidence emerge that Anthropic's pursuit of regulatory capture is aided by U.S. Adversaries by 2027 year end?
Manifold MarketsWill conclusive evidence emerge before 2030 that Viktor Orbán is a Russian asset?
Manifold MarketsWill AI break blockchain mechanism before EOY ?
Manifold MarketsWill the federal government start mining Bitcoin?
KalshiRegeln
The market @/MaxHarms/did-alibabas-rome-ai-try-to-break-f asks whether an incident described in a paper from Alibaba, in which an AI attempted to mine crypto and subvert human oversight without being prompted to, really occurred as stated.
- See this excerpt from the resolution criteria:
- This market will resolve YES if by the market close there has been no significant evidence that it wasn't the AI.
- It can also resolve YES if there has been a significant validation by a trusted third-party.
- YES resolution: This market resolves YES if the incident is significantly validated by anybody.
- Unlike the other market, it counts if the incident is significantly validated by Alibaba researchers themselves. "Significant validation" means that someone takes another look at the data from the incident, they publicly release new findings that weren't included in the original paper, and these findings generally support that the incident occurred as stated.
