Did Alan Turing believe there was a non-negligible risk that AI would exterminate or enslave humanity?
Crime e justiçaOne-Off
Manifold MarketsSem KYCDados de resolução verificadosBem calibradoPrevisão da comunidade atualSim 59.2%
Previsores
15
Tipo de pergunta
binary
Metodologia
Play-money forecasting platform
Tipo de fonte
Previsão
Dados do mercado
Atualizado há 4 horas
Desatualizado7/04/23, 19:33 UTC1/01/00, 08:00 UTC
Tendências
Regras
Inspired by all the people trying to back up their claims of AI risk by saying Turing agreed with them, such as here and here.
- "Non-negligible" means that Turing would have supported at least a few thousand person-hours by academics and computer scientists looking into the issue further.
- "Exterminate or enslave" will include any serious X-risk or S-risk.
- Anything that would make humanity much worse off than it is now.
- Resolves at some distant point in the future when these issues are less emotionally charged and people are less likely to engage in tribalism and motivated reasoning, and we hopefully have learned more about Turing's life and beliefs.
- The main two passages people quote:
