Will Tumbles become convinced that local realism is false before 2027? (quantum physics)
One-OffWetenschap2mnd
Manifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdHuidige gemeenschapsvoorspelling
Ja 73.8%
Ja 73.8%Voorspellers
4
Vraagtype
binary
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 9 uur geleden
Verouderd5 jan 26, 11:04 UTC1 jan 27, 12:20 UTC
Trends
Gerelateerde Markten
Gerelateerde vragen voor context, geen vergelijking van gelijkwaardige contracten.
Will I deem Donut Lab's solid state battery claims in their video to have been false one year from now?
Manifold MarketsWill a woman win the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, or Economics?
Manifold MarketsWhich states will report local cases in the May 2026 Ebola Bundibugyo outbreak
Manifold MarketsUSNCO Local performance
Manifold MarketsWhen will the first useful quantum computer be developed?
KalshiWill the US confirm that aliens exist by which date?
PolymarketRegels
I've been watching pop science videos and reading forum posts about quantum physics, and I've become convinced that the Bell's Theorem Experiment is wrong, I don't think it disproves local realism.
- I recognize that it's arrogant for me to imagine I know better than actual physicists when I'm basically just some idiot who never took physics in college.
- There's obviously something I'm missing, some technical details I'm overlooking with my weak understanding of how the experiment works.
- But I'll never figure out what I'm missing if I go around rejecting my own faculties!
- Although I've become convinced that the mainstream interpretation is wrong, apparently there is ongoing disagreement about what the experiment proves and the underlying nature of quantum physics.
- AND my personal idiot belief does not have any practical difference from mainstream interpretations- my whole point is that experiments and technology should work the same either way.