Will an American presidential candidate in 2028 run on a platform that includes nationalizing or pausing AGI?
EconomíaIAOne-OffPolítica de EE. UU.PolíticaElección1a
Manifold MarketsSin KYCDatos de resolución verificadosCalibración aceptablePronóstico comunitario actualSí 86.4%
Pronosticadores
28
Tipo de pregunta
binary
Metodología
Play-money forecasting platform
Tipo de fuente
Pronóstico
Datos de mercado
Actualizado hace 17 horas
Desactualizado30 dic 23, 20:25 UTC2 ene 28, 7:59 UTC
Tendencias
Reglas
“American presidential candidate” - I’ll define this as the set of candidates for the 2028 presidential election who participate in at least one primary debate for either mainstream party, as well as candidates (from any party) who at some point after January 1, 2028 are polling at above 3% in at least two reputable general election polls.
- “A platform that includes nationalizing or pausing AGI” - Issues related to AI do not need to be the primary focal point of the candidate platform, but the candidate must regularly reference in their public appearances a stance on AI that directly and explicitly supports a significant form of nationalization or a state-enforced pause of either development or deployment.
- Here are some roughly outlined stances which would/would not count:
- Would count towards a YES resolution:
- “AGI development cannot continue to be done by private companies who are not directly accountable to the American people”
- “There must be a Manhattan Project for AI”
