Manifold MarketsSem KYCDados de resolução verificadosBem calibradoPrevisão da comunidade atualNão 78.5%
Previsores
57
Tipo de pergunta
binary
Metodologia
Play-money forecasting platform
Tipo de fonte
Previsão
Dados do mercado
Atualizado há 3 horas
Desatualizado25/05/23, 17:47 UTC31/12/26, 22:59 UTC
Tendências
Mercados Relacionados
Perguntas relacionadas para dar contexto, não uma comparação de contratos equivalentes.
If someone commits anti-AI-xrisk terrorism, will AI xrisk worries be generally marginalized afterwards?
Manifold MarketsWill a sex scandal negatively affect the reputation of AI xrisk in the next five years?
Manifold MarketsWhich company has best AI model end of 2026?
PolymarketBest AI at the end of 2026?
KalshiAnthropic IPO Closing Market Cap
PolymarketWill Anthropic’s valuation hit __ by December 31?
PolymarketRegras
Lately it seems like there's been a bunch of people taking big AI risks seriously, from OpenAI's Governance of superintelligence to Deepmind's Model evaluation for extreme risks.
- We're not quite there yet in terms of my standards for safety, and even less there in terms of e.g. Eliezer Yudkowsky's.
- However I wonder if this marks a turning point.
- Obviously this is a very subjective question, so I am warning you ahead of time that it is going to resolve in opinionated ways.
- Trying to anchor the discussion, I expect the following to be necessary for a YES resolution:
- Major leading AI companies openly acknowledge that existential risk is a possibility, not just in a marginal sense (e.g. internal discussion of it by employees, rare cases where the leaders begrudgingly admit it) but also in a central sense (e.g. openly having research teams working on it, having long sections of documents for politicians discussing it).