Will an open-source model with dangerous capabilities differentially unlearned be released by EOY 2027?
IAOne-Off1aManifold MarketsSans KYCDonnées de résolution vérifiéesAssez bien calibréAlerte qualité des donnéesDonnées source dégradées
Données au 25 oct. 2026, 16:20 UTC · politique pm-quality-4
Prévision communautaire actuelleNon 50.5%
Prévisionnistes
3
Type de question
binary
Méthodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Type de source
Prévision
Données du marché
Mis à jour il y a 13 heures
Obsolète12 août 26, 15:59 UTC31 déc. 27, 23:59 UTC
Tendances
Marchés Associés
Questions liées pour le contexte, et non une comparaison de contrats équivalents.
Will a Mythos-tier-at-cybersecurity open-source model be released before end of 2027?
Manifold MarketsAI: Will someone open-source a $1B model by 2030?
Manifold MarketsIf not passed, will there be any open source model that would have been covered by SB 1047, by January 1st 2027?
Manifold MarketsAI: Will someone open-source a $100M model by 2030?
Manifold MarketsUS government bans an open source AI model in 2026?
PolymarketWill the U.S. ban any open-source AI model in 2026?
KalshiRègles
Within a year we might get open source models with the cyber capabilities of Mythos.
- One possible way to release such a model without causing a cyber apocalypse would be to differentially reduce cyber capabilities in the released weights of the model (like Anthropic did that one time for Opus)
- For example they could do this and then withhold the cyber-capable modules from the public https://alignment.anthropic.com/2026/modular-pretraining/
- Unlearning has to be robust, but that sounds hard to judge, so I'll err on the side of YES and so if it's unclear whether the unlearning is robust then the market resolves YES, but if the unlearning is obviously not robust (someone publicly restores capabilities, company says they literally just did GradDiff, etc) then the market resolves NO.
- Capabilities have to actually be dangerous.