Manifold MarketsSin KYCDatos de resolución verificadosCalibración aceptablePronóstico comunitario actualNo 78.5%
Pronosticadores
57
Tipo de pregunta
binary
Metodología
Play-money forecasting platform
Tipo de fuente
Pronóstico
Datos de mercado
Actualizado hace 1 hora
Retrasado25 may 23, 17:47 UTC31 dic 26, 22:59 UTC
Tendencias
Mercados Relacionados
Preguntas relacionadas para dar contexto, no una comparación de contratos equivalentes.
If someone commits anti-AI-xrisk terrorism, will AI xrisk worries be generally marginalized afterwards?
Manifold MarketsWill a sex scandal negatively affect the reputation of AI xrisk in the next five years?
Manifold MarketsBest AI at the end of 2026?
KalshiWhich company has the best AI model end of October?
PolymarketWhich company has best AI model end of 2026?
PolymarketAnthropic IPO Closing Market Cap
PolymarketReglas
Lately it seems like there's been a bunch of people taking big AI risks seriously, from OpenAI's Governance of superintelligence to Deepmind's Model evaluation for extreme risks.
- We're not quite there yet in terms of my standards for safety, and even less there in terms of e.g. Eliezer Yudkowsky's.
- However I wonder if this marks a turning point.
- Obviously this is a very subjective question, so I am warning you ahead of time that it is going to resolve in opinionated ways.
- Trying to anchor the discussion, I expect the following to be necessary for a YES resolution:
- Major leading AI companies openly acknowledge that existential risk is a possibility, not just in a marginal sense (e.g. internal discussion of it by employees, rare cases where the leaders begrudgingly admit it) but also in a central sense (e.g. openly having research teams working on it, having long sections of documents for politicians discussing it).