Did the Russians deliberately blow up the Nova Kakhovka dam? (Resolves NO if it was negligence rather than sabotage)
GeopolitiekOne-OffRussia / UkraineChessSport3mnd
Manifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdHuidige gemeenschapsvoorspelling
Ja 64.3%
Voorspellers
122
Vraagtype
binary
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 14 uur geleden
Verouderd6 jun 23, 20:56 UTC2 jan 27, 04:59 UTC
Trends
Gerelateerde Markten
Gerelateerde vragen voor context, geen vergelijking van gelijkwaardige contracten.
Will the majority of Russians cease to support "the actions of the Russian armed forces in Ukraine" in 2026?
Manifold MarketsEU country blames Russia for new sabotage attack by which date?
PolymarketUS-Iran nuclear deal [Kalshi] resolves the same as US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal [Polymarket]
Manifold MarketsWill the problem with Ceuta (an Spanish city) and Morocco resolves before 2027?
Manifold MarketsConservatives flip Liberals for Canada Seats Polls in 2026?
PolymarketNATO x Russia military clash by which date?
PolymarketRegels
This market is specifically asking whether the Russians deliberately blew up / sabotaged the dam vs whether it was merely negligence on their part.
- One caveat to the above: the question is ultimately about intention.
- If it becomes known with confidence that the Russians deliberately neglected to maintain the dam with intention that it should fail, then I would resolve YES.
- But the presumption would be against this if it failed through lack of maintenance rather than active sabotage.
- To be resolved by the consensus of American sources.
- I may choose to resolve to Market if there is some ambiguity and the market price seems basically reasonable and not manipulated or an artifact of poor liquidity, but if not, or if it seems pretty clear cut to me, then I'll resolve to my own best judgement of the consensus of trustworthy American sources, including both government sources and news media.