In twenty years, will the best evidence show very substantial (>one quarter) declines in fertility rate (relative to couples trying equally hard to conceive in the past) due to decreasing sperm count, in at least one country?
One-OffSanté et médecineScience16aManifold MarketsSans KYCDonnées de résolution vérifiéesAssez bien calibréPrévision communautaire actuelleNon 85%
Prévisionnistes
42
Type de question
binary
Méthodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Type de source
Prévision
Données du marché
Mis à jour il y a 3 heures
Obsolète17 févr. 23, 04:38 UTC2 janv. 43, 07:59 UTC
Tendances
Marchés Associés
Questions liées pour le contexte, et non une comparaison de contrats équivalents.
In twenty years, will the best evidence available suggest that sperm counts have been substantially declining across most of the world?
Manifold MarketsIn twenty years, the best evidence will suggest that sperm counts are substantially declining across most of the world
Manifold MarketsConditional on a consensus 20 years from now that sperm count has been declining, what will scientists believe was the most important factor?
Manifold MarketsWill the switch from 100LL (leaded aviation gas) to 100UL (unleaded aviation gas) cause small airports to become a thing of the past due to a lack of sufficient revenue?
Manifold MarketsWill WHO declare Hantavirus a Public Health Emergency of International Concern this Year?
KalshiHow many human H5N1 cases will be reported in the United States in 2026?
KalshiRègles
Related to ACX post "Declining Sperm Count: Much More Than You Wanted To Know".
- Although this says "in at least one country", this is just about whether one country is able to detect it, and I will only mark it as true if it seems to be related to a global phenomenon; ie if there is a chemical spill in one country that causes its fertility to decrease, this will not count.
