Will SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?

US PoliticsOne-OffTech2a

KalshiVérifier la disponibilitéKYC requis2% de fraisDonnées de résolution vérifiéesGrossièrement calibré

Alerte qualité des donnéesPrix non significatif

Données au 27 juil. 2026, 01:40 UTC · politique pm-quality-3

Probabilité implicite actuelle

Non 100%

Qualite du marche

39 / 100

Faible qualité

Volume 24h

0 €

Liquidité

0 €

Faible liquidité

Achat / Vente

74.0% / 81.0%

Spread

7.0 pt

Spread large

Données du marché

Mis à jour il y a 17 minutes

23 juil. 26, 14:001 août 28, 14:00

Tendances

Résultat24hProbabilité

Oui

Non

100%

Fonds fictifs uniquement, aucun argent réelCeci n'est pas un conseil financier

Résultat choisi

Yes0%

Mise (USDT)

Règles

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.

Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.
Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028.
A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes.
A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No.

Marchés Associés

Will SCOTUS overturn or narrow Stinson deference to federal sentencing-guideline commentary?

48,4 €

Oui: 70%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS require 12-person juries for serious felonies?

4,4 €

Oui: 79%

KALSHI

Will the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?

0 €

Oui: 71%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?

0 €

Oui: 84%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?

0 €

Oui: 61%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS bar unpled affirmative defenses at summary judgment?

0 €

Oui: 66%

KALSHI

Actifs dans ces sujets

BitcoinBTC$63,399.27-3.25%

EthereumETH$1,881.18-4.40%

SolanaSOL$73.16-4.64%

DogecoinDOGE$0.0699-4.48%

BNBBNB$564.84-1.94%

XRPXRP$1.06-4.92%

Actualités Associées

Google Ships New Gemini Flash Models, But Pro Is Still MissingDecrypt

Polymarket: Vance leads 2028 at 19.85% as pricing trend softensBlockchain.News

White House pushes Senate Democrats to take 'historic' crypto Clarity Act ethics dealCoindesk

Senate nears bipartisan CLARITY Act deal after ethics breakthroughCrypto News

Google Is Building an AI Chip Just for Gemini—And Investors Already Moved On ItDecrypt

White House agrees to ethics provisions in market structure billCointelegraph

Règles

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.

Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.
Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028.
A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes.
A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No.

Will SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?

US PoliticsOne-OffTech2a

KalshiVérifier la disponibilitéKYC requis2% de fraisDonnées de résolution vérifiéesGrossièrement calibré

Alerte qualité des donnéesPrix non significatif

Données au 27 juil. 2026, 01:40 UTC · politique pm-quality-3

Probabilité implicite actuelle

Non 100%

Qualite du marche

39 / 100

Faible qualité

Volume 24h

0 €

Liquidité

0 €

Faible liquidité

Achat / Vente

74.0% / 81.0%

Spread

7.0 pt

Spread large

Données du marché

Mis à jour il y a 17 minutes

23 juil. 26, 14:001 août 28, 14:00

Tendances

Résultat24hProbabilité

Oui

Non

100%

Fonds fictifs uniquement, aucun argent réelCeci n'est pas un conseil financier

Résultat choisi

Yes0%

Mise (USDT)

Règles

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.

Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.
Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028.
A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes.
A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No.

Marchés Associés

Will SCOTUS overturn or narrow Stinson deference to federal sentencing-guideline commentary?

48,4 €

Oui: 70%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS require 12-person juries for serious felonies?

4,4 €

Oui: 79%

KALSHI

Will the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?

0 €

Oui: 71%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?

0 €

Oui: 84%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?

0 €

Oui: 61%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS bar unpled affirmative defenses at summary judgment?

0 €

Oui: 66%

KALSHI

Actifs dans ces sujets

BitcoinBTC$63,399.27-3.25%

EthereumETH$1,881.18-4.40%

SolanaSOL$73.16-4.64%

DogecoinDOGE$0.0699-4.48%

BNBBNB$564.84-1.94%

XRPXRP$1.06-4.92%

Actualités Associées

Google Ships New Gemini Flash Models, But Pro Is Still MissingDecrypt

Polymarket: Vance leads 2028 at 19.85% as pricing trend softensBlockchain.News

White House pushes Senate Democrats to take 'historic' crypto Clarity Act ethics dealCoindesk

Senate nears bipartisan CLARITY Act deal after ethics breakthroughCrypto News

Google Is Building an AI Chip Just for Gemini—And Investors Already Moved On ItDecrypt

White House agrees to ethics provisions in market structure billCointelegraph

Règles

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.

Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.
Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028.
A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes.
A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No.