Will an American presidential candidate in 2028 run on a platform that includes nationalizing or pausing AGI?
EconomieAIOne-OffAmerikaanse politiekPolitiekVerkiezing1j
Manifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdHuidige gemeenschapsvoorspellingJa 86.4%
Voorspellers
28
Vraagtype
binary
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 33 minuten geleden
30 dec 23, 20:25 UTC2 jan 28, 07:59 UTC
Trends
Regels
“American presidential candidate” - I’ll define this as the set of candidates for the 2028 presidential election who participate in at least one primary debate for either mainstream party, as well as candidates (from any party) who at some point after January 1, 2028 are polling at above 3% in at least two reputable general election polls.
- “A platform that includes nationalizing or pausing AGI” - Issues related to AI do not need to be the primary focal point of the candidate platform, but the candidate must regularly reference in their public appearances a stance on AI that directly and explicitly supports a significant form of nationalization or a state-enforced pause of either development or deployment.
- Here are some roughly outlined stances which would/would not count:
- Would count towards a YES resolution:
- “AGI development cannot continue to be done by private companies who are not directly accountable to the American people”
- “There must be a Manhattan Project for AI”
