In twenty years, will the best evidence show very substantial (>one quarter) declines in fertility rate (relative to couples trying equally hard to conceive in the past) due to decreasing sperm count, in at least one country?
One-OffGezondheid en geneeskundeWetenschap16jManifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdWaarschuwing datakwaliteitBrongegevens verslechterd
Gegevens van 25 okt 2026, 21:13 UTC · beleid pm-quality-4
Huidige gemeenschapsvoorspellingNee 85%
Voorspellers
42
Vraagtype
binary
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 4 uur geleden
Verouderd17 feb 23, 04:38 UTC2 jan 43, 07:59 UTC
Trends
Gerelateerde Markten
Gerelateerde vragen voor context, geen vergelijking van gelijkwaardige contracten.
In twenty years, will the best evidence available suggest that sperm counts have been substantially declining across most of the world?
Manifold MarketsIn twenty years, the best evidence will suggest that sperm counts are substantially declining across most of the world
Manifold MarketsConditional on a consensus 20 years from now that sperm count has been declining, what will scientists believe was the most important factor?
Manifold MarketsWill the switch from 100LL (leaded aviation gas) to 100UL (unleaded aviation gas) cause small airports to become a thing of the past due to a lack of sufficient revenue?
Manifold MarketsHow many human screwworm cases will be reported in the United States in 2026?
KalshiWhen will Beam Therapeutics submit a BLA for Risto-cel?
KalshiRegels
Related to ACX post "Declining Sperm Count: Much More Than You Wanted To Know".
- Although this says "in at least one country", this is just about whether one country is able to detect it, and I will only mark it as true if it seems to be related to a global phenomenon; ie if there is a chemical spill in one country that causes its fertility to decrease, this will not count.
