Will the New York Times v. OpenAI suit cause a setback for AI safety?
IAOne-OffCriminalité et justice2mois
Manifold MarketsSans KYCDonnées de résolution vérifiéesAssez bien calibréAlerte qualité des donnéesDonnées source dégradées
Données au 26 oct. 2026, 05:51 UTC · politique pm-quality-4
Prévision communautaire actuelleNon 90.9%
Prévisionnistes
5
Type de question
binary
Méthodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Type de source
Prévision
Données du marché
Mis à jour il y a 9 heures
Obsolète30 déc. 23, 17:44 UTC2 janv. 27, 04:59 UTC
Tendances
Règles
The New York Times, in its lawsuit against OpenAI, seeks the deletion of all language models trained with data that includes any Times articles.
- Should that happen, it is likely that a precedent will be set that prevents other companies from including articles from any newspaper in their training data.
- At the same time, it will be impossible to enforce such a provision against open source models, some of which will have anonymous authors.
- Effective altruists like @EliezerYudkowsky have often criticized open source AI as dangerous and believe that limitations on the distribution of model architectures and weights are preferable.
- This market resolves to YES if:
- The lawsuit is decided in the New York Times' favor, either by judgment or by settlement
