![[5k Subsidy] Which diseases will be eliminated first in the USA? 1st solved 100%, 2nd 95%, 3rd 90%, etc. until mid 2036](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.googleapis.com%2Fmantic-markets.appspot.com%2Fcontract-images%2FErnie%252F9b728a68a79f.jpg&w=128&q=80)
[5k Subsidy] Which diseases will be eliminated first in the USA? 1st solved 100%, 2nd 95%, 3rd 90%, etc. until mid 2036
RégulationIA9a
Manifold MarketsSans KYCDonnées de résolution vérifiéesAssez bien calibréPrévision communautaire actuelle
Malaria 66.8%En tête parmi 35 options
Malaria 66.8%Prévisionnistes
42
Type de question
multiple choice
Méthodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Type de source
Prévision
Variation 7j
0.0 pts
Données du marché
Mis à jour il y a 38 minutes
25 févr. 24, 22:07 UTC1 juil. 36, 06:59 UTC
Tendances
Actifs Sensibles au Macro
Marchés Associés
Questions liées pour le contexte, et non une comparaison de contrats équivalents.
October 2026 1st, 2nd, or 3rd hottest on record?
PolymarketWill the Supreme Court decide that sports event contracts are protected under the Commodities Exchange Act? [1k subsidy]
Manifold MarketsWhen will Anthropic officially announce an IPO?
KalshiU.S. enacts AI safety bill before 2027?
PolymarketWhat AI regulations will the US Congress pass into law before January 3, 2027? [ADD ANSWERS]
Manifold MarketsBy Oct 31, 2026, will openai.com say its agents accessed a U.S. federal government system without authorization?
Manifold MarketsRègles
Cured means that in the US, the disease occurs/harms/kills at a rate <=10% the rate it occurred in US residents at EOY 2023 (or best available).
- That is, the rate of new cases of the disease has decreased by at least 90%
- OR, cases happen more often that that BUT the negative consequences can and are normally and easily solved. i.e. if it does happen, the damage done is only 10% as bad as before (by total life expectancy or total QALY impact).
- For example, if we make a disease which used to cause -10 lifespan only take -2, that's not quite enough, but if we also reduce the negative QALY impact by 90%, then that is clearly enough.
- Hard case: where the combined improvement is >90% but the individual QALY+expectancy numbers aren't below it.
- I would like to count this case as a yes but that is proportional to net damage.