Will SCOTUS require state-law compensation in private natural-gas condemnations?
CommoditiesOne-OffUS Politics1a
KalshiVérifier la disponibilitéKYC requis2% de fraisDonnées de résolution vérifiéesAssez bien calibréProbabilité implicite actuelle
Oui 54%
Qualité du marché
40 / 100
Faible qualitéVolume 24h
—
Liquidité
348,3 €
Faible liquiditéAchat / Vente
47.0% / 54.0%
Écart
7.0 pt
Spread largeDonnées du marché
Mis à jour il y a 10 minutes
24 juil. 26, 00:00 UTC1 août 28, 14:00 UTC
Tendances
Marchés Associés
Questions liées pour le contexte, et non une comparaison de contrats équivalents.
Will SCOTUS reject a benchmark requirement for ERISA fund-underperformance claims?
KalshiWill the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?
KalshiWill SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?
KalshiWill SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?
KalshiWill SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?
KalshiWill SCOTUS bar unpled affirmative defenses at summary judgment?
KalshiRègles
If the Supreme Court, in Hoffmann v.
Règlement via:Supreme Court
- WBI Energy Transmission, Inc., rules state law governs the determination of just compensation in private condemnations under the Natural Gas Act, then the market resolves to Yes.
- The Payout Criterion encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court has ruled that, in private condemnations under the Natural Gas Act, just compensation must be determined by reference to state law, after Issuance and before August 1, 2028.
- The market resolves to No if the Court rules that compensation is governed solely by federal law, including the constitutional minimum required by the Fifth Amendment, or if the case is dismissed, found to have been improvidently granted, remanded, or otherwise disposed of without a merits ruling on whether state law governs the determination of compensation.
Marchés ouverts
Commodities
POLYMARKETWhat will WTI Crude Oil (WTI) hit in September 2026?
- ↑ $90+35.5pt100%
- ↑ $85+5.7pt100%
- ↓ $90100%
+22 résultats de plus
- Volume total
- 1,6 M €
- Volume 24h
- 211,6 k €
KALSHIWill the Clarity Act become law?
- Before Jan 1, 2028-11.0pt40%
- Before Oct 1, 2027-15.0pt40%
- Before Jul 1, 2027-15.0pt32%
+7 résultats de plus
KALSHIOil Price (WTI) on Sep 9, 2026?
- Above $89.99+14.0pt99%
- Above $88.49+5.0pt99%
- Above $87.99+4.0pt99%
+27 résultats de plus
- Volume total
KALSHIUS gas prices this week
- Above 4.1400+26.0pt99%
- Above 4.1200+16.0pt99%
- Above 4.0800+3.0pt99%
+18 résultats de plus
- Volume total
KALSHIBrent crude oil price on September 09, 2026 at 5:00 PM EDT?
- Above $96.5097%
- Above $9596%
- Above $95.5095%
+17 résultats de plus
- Volume total
- 70,8 k €
- Volume 24h
- 70,8 k €
POLYMARKETCrude Oil all time high by which date?
- December 31+1.0pt11%
- September 30+0.3pt2%
- May 31-0.4pt0%
+1 résultats de plus
- Oil Price (WTI) on Sep 11, 2026?
- How high will oil (WTI) get by Dec 31, 2026?
- How high will peak electricity demand on the Texas ERCOT grid get in 2026?
- Copper price on September 09, 2026 at 5:00 PM EDT?
- Brent crude oil price on September 30, 2026 at 5:00 PM EDT?
- Crude Oil’s next move: Pump to $120 or Dump to $55?
- What will Gold (XAUUSD) hit in September 2026?
- US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by which date?
- Gas prices in the US in Sep 2026?
- What will Gold (XAUUSD) hit Week of September 7 2026?
- Gold price on September 09, 2026 at 5:00 PM EDT?
Questions fréquentes
- Quelles sont les probabilités actuelles pour Will SCOTUS require state-law compensation in private natural-gas condemnations? ?
- Kalshi cote Yes à 54% au 9 septembre 2026.
- Quand Will SCOTUS require state-law compensation in private natural-gas condemnations? sera-t-il résolu ?
- Will SCOTUS require state-law compensation in private natural-gas condemnations? doit être résolu le 1 août 2028.
- Comment Will SCOTUS require state-law compensation in private natural-gas condemnations? est-il réglé ?
- Kalshi règle ce marché comme suit : If the Supreme Court, in Hoffmann v.