Will Elon Musk's accusation against Substack turn out to be true?
One-OffTecnologíaNegocios y empresasCrimen y justicia2mManifold MarketsSin KYCDatos de resolución verificadosBien calibradoPronóstico comunitario actualNo 79.2%
Pronosticadores
9
Tipo de pregunta
binary
Metodología
Play-money forecasting platform
Tipo de fuente
Pronóstico
Datos de mercado
Actualizado hace 13 minutos
18 abr 23, 19:23 UTC31 dic 26, 18:23 UTC
Tendencias
Reglas
Elon accuses Substack of "illegally downloading vast amounts of data to pre-populate their Twitter clone." "massive theft of Twitter data"
- https://www.benzinga.com/news/23/04/31737312/elon-musk-accuses-substack-of-massive-theft-in-attempt-to-compete-with-twitter
- (and Elon says that this is the reason twitter's systems censored substack, but that part of the story isn't what we'll be evaluating here.
- My guess is that most of what twitter did to them was deliberate and vindictive, but that the initial response could have been triggered by automatic systems, and it would be meaningful if it had been.)
- What made this interesting for me is that I seem to remember seeing Substack claim that they didn't do it, though I'm unable to source it now, it'd be greatly appreciated if someone could find substack's response to the accusation.
- I'll resolve the market when we learn one way or the other.
