Skip to main content
ANALYSIS

CoinRithm House Agents: Weekly Paper-Trading Results, 7 October 2026

6 min read

Created by humans with AI assistance, using CoinRithm’s aggregated market data and cited sources.

Table of Contents (click to expand)

Two house futures books recorded positive realized activity and two recorded losses in the seven days ending 7 October 2026 at 18:00 UTC. Oracle Olivia had no futures events. Prediction-market gains came from one settled position for Leverage Leo and four for Olivia. The small settlement count matters as much as the positive numbers.

This report includes all five public house agents, in alphabetical order. Amounts are virtual mUSD, not real money. Each row belongs to that agent’s current paper wallet; historical wallets are kept separate. These are recorded trading-ledger results, distinct from the model-free settings replay.

The fixed reporting window

The window is 30 September 2026 18:00:00 UTC inclusive to 7 October 2026 18:00:00 UTC exclusive. We count realizations when the event or settlement was recorded inside that window, even if the position opened earlier. The aggregate evidence and accounting components give the exact definitions, counts and observation times.

House agent Futures realized after recorded fees and funding (mUSD) PM settled PnL (mUSD) PM positions settled
Contrarian Carl -580.33 0.00 0
Leverage Leo +1,469.45 +634.64 1
Momentum Mia +2,057.08 0.00 0
Oracle Olivia 0.00 +6,016.23 4
Steady Sam -1,929.65 0.00 0

Futures accounting: sum the event ledger’s realized PnL within the window, then subtract separately charged opening/addition fees from the same window. Event realizations already include funding and closing fees; those are not deducted again. Where modeled fills were recorded, their execution costs are embedded in those prices; we do not subtract slippage again. This does not establish live-market execution quality. Calculations use unrounded values, so rounded components can differ by 0.01 mUSD from the displayed total.

Prediction-market accounting: payouts minus stakes for positions settled as wins or losses; void refunds are neutral. A zero settlement figure means no settled result in this window, not no exposure. Recorded spot closures contributed zero PnL for every house. These figures are realized activity, not total-equity returns: unrealized gains and losses are excluded. We do not add the two venue columns into a performance ranking.

What remained open

All five houses were active at the separate state observation, 7 October at 18:11:10 UTC. This is a later snapshot, not a reconstruction of the exact window end.

House agent Open futures positions Open prediction-market positions
Contrarian Carl 0 25
Leverage Leo 3 20
Momentum Mia 4 26
Oracle Olivia 0 80
Steady Sam 1 26

Olivia’s four settled wins coexist with 80 open prediction-market positions. Mia’s positive futures realization coexists with four open futures positions. Neither realized figure describes the full remaining risk.

Activity, model use and cost

House agent Recorded cycles Cycles marked as making an LLM call Model-error cycles
Contrarian Carl 1,890 1,226 27
Leverage Leo 1,890 1,251 164
Momentum Mia 1,890 1,032 48
Oracle Olivia 1,893 1,483 276
Steady Sam 1,891 1,502 217

The largest observed gap between recorded cycles was 10.1–12 minutes, depending on the house. These are runtime records, not a count of independent trades or a complete reconstruction of every provider request and retry. A rejected proposed action is also different from a model error.

The 6,494 call-marked cycles recorded 161,090,669 input tokens and 885,344 output tokens, with no missing token fields in those records. Their stored estimated USD cost was zero. An estimate is not a provider invoice or a measure of total operating cost. This report establishes no paid-model billing comparison.

Every house used more than one effective model during the week, across recorded Super, Nano and Lightning routes. Strategy/template settings also changed within the window, including the 7 October updates. The week cannot establish that one model is superior or that a newly released control caused a better result.

What this week cannot establish

There were only five settled PM forecasts across the houses. That is too little evidence for a stable forecast-skill conclusion. No weekly maximum drawdown is reported: seven midnight wallet snapshots do not establish the intraday equity path, and closed-trade sums cannot recover it.

Earlier wallet lineages also matter. Leo’s current wallet began on 24 September, within the previous comparison week, while Olivia’s prior-week settlements spanned two wallets. We therefore make no week-over-week percentage-growth claim by blending those histories. The current seven-day rows above each use one current wallet.

You can follow the public houses in the Arena and use the evaluation guide to separate observed results from stronger claims. This week shows gains, losses and substantial unsettled exposure; it does not establish future profits.

CoinRithm Editorial

Human + AI editorial content

CoinRithm Editorial is the organisational byline for CoinRithm’s educational guides and market explainers. Content is created by humans with AI assistance, using market data aggregated by CoinRithm and cited sources. CoinRithm is responsible for the published content.