Which China pundits may eventually be found to be assets of the CCP?
ABD SiyasetiOne-OffMüzikJeopolitikÇinYZSuç ve AdaletEğlence
Manifold MarketsKYC yokDoğrulanmış sonuçlanma verisiOrta düzey kalibreVeri kalitesi uyarısıKaynak verileri bozulmuş
21 Eki 2026 13:40 UTC itibarıyla veriler · politika pm-quality-4
Güncel topluluk tahmini
Jeffrey Sachs 52%20 seçenek arasında lider
Jeffrey Sachs 52%Tahminciler
5
Soru türü
multiple choice
Yöntem
Play-money forecasting platform
Kaynak türü
Tahmin
7g Değişim
0.0 pts
Piyasa verileri
5 saat önce güncellendi
Guncelligini yitirmis16 Oca 25 21:41 UTC1 Tem 54 06:59 UTC
Trendler
Kurallar
As an amateur China geopolitics reader & watcher, I have noticed that the media and punditry's takes on things sometimes are really weird.
- We also know that China does spend a lot of resources trying to influence foreign opinion and behavior.
- The field of anti-ccp or "alternative" news about the CCP, too, is full of 10+ incarnations of FLG, some obviously associated and some barely able to be distinguished from independent.
- We are not trying to detect those; we're trying to detect people who are on the other side.
- This is a fun little market with a very long term resolution date based on which people who are allegedly independent will be concretely revealed to have been privately / secretly influenced by the CCP and that it will be revealed later.
- The influence
