Will major AI research institutions adopt AI tax policy as a research priority by the end of 2027?
EuropaOne-Off1j
Manifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensGoed gekalibreerdHuidige gemeenschapsvoorspelling
Ja 54.3%Koploper van 3 uitkomsten
Ja 54.3%Voorspellers
4
Vraagtype
multiple choice
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
7d wijziging
0.0 pts
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 5 uur geleden
Verouderd30 jun 24, 09:06 UTC31 dec 27, 22:59 UTC
Trends
Regels
Question Description: As advanced AI could pose existential risks and also reshape labour markets leading to inequality, this question examines whether by December 31, 2027 top AI governance research institutions (listed below) will emphasize tax strategies for AI to address mentioned challenges .
- These strategies might include e.g. taxing AI operations, data usage, and compute resources as means to manage AI development costs and mitigate associated risks.
- The focus is on whether and how research institutions addresses AI's economic and safety implications through innovative tax policies.
- Resolution Criteria: This question will resolve as "Yes" if, by the end of 2027, any of the top research non-profits dealing with AI governance (listed below), publicly commits to prioritizing tax policy research focused on AI's impact on labour, inequality or safety.
- Acceptable indicators include announcements of new research initiatives, research papers, funding for specific studies on AI taxation, or the establishment of teams dedicated to exploring these fiscal strategies.
- This excludes any announcements from international bodies such as the UN, OECD, or EU, as well as US think tanks like CSET or RAND.
