Many people do not currently see gene editing to cure e.g., cancer, sickle-cell, or down syndrom as a clear moral good that humanity should be persuing.
Will this change by 2030?
Currently, I count ~40% of the most recent tweets containing the term "gene editing" as clearly negative; "gene therapy" is much, much worse.
Twitter may not be the most approprite source by time of resolution, but I will try to find a broadly equivalnt source of popular opinion.
When I look at statements of popular opinion, will at least 90% be positive or neutral? By default, I will treat technical statements of valid research as neutral, even if they show negative results or document risks.
I will search for whatever term or terms are most commonly used in 2030.
Wat zijn de huidige kansen voor By 2030, will gene editing to cure serious genetic diseases be seen as generally uncontroversial??
Manifold Markets prijst No op 79% per 8 september 2026.
Wanneer wordt By 2030, will gene editing to cure serious genetic diseases be seen as generally uncontroversial? afgewikkeld?
By 2030, will gene editing to cure serious genetic diseases be seen as generally uncontroversial? wordt naar verwachting op 31 december 2030 afgewikkeld.
Hoe wordt By 2030, will gene editing to cure serious genetic diseases be seen as generally uncontroversial? afgewikkeld?
Manifold Markets wikkelt deze markt als volgt af: Many people do not currently see gene editing to cure e.g., cancer, sickle-cell, or down syndrom as a clear moral good that humanity should be persuing.