By 2030, will gene editing to cure serious genetic diseases be seen as generally uncontroversial?
Gezondheid en geneeskundeOne-Off4jManifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdWaarschuwing datakwaliteitBrongegevens verslechterd
Gegevens van 24 okt 2026, 13:31 UTC · beleid pm-quality-4
Huidige gemeenschapsvoorspellingNee 79.3%
Voorspellers
47
Vraagtype
binary
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 3 uur geleden
Verouderd23 dec 22, 02:32 UTC31 dec 30, 23:59 UTC
Trends
Gerelateerde Markten
Gerelateerde vragen voor context, geen vergelijking van gelijkwaardige contracten.
[ACX 2026] Will the US, UK or EU approve a gene editing therapy for a new condition during 2026?
Manifold MarketsWill the US, UK or EU approve a gene editing therapy for a new condition during 2026?
FutuurWill GiveWell research gene-editing mosquitoes to eradicate malaria?
Manifold MarketsWhen will there be a confirmation* of an adult human, whose IQ score was improved by 15 by gene-editing?
Manifold MarketsWhen will commercial gene-editing therapy be available?
Manifold MarketsWill the ACA premium tax credits be extended?
KalshiRegels
Many people do not currently see gene editing to cure e.g., cancer, sickle-cell, or down syndrom as a clear moral good that humanity should be persuing.
- Will this change by 2030?
- Currently, I count ~40% of the most recent tweets containing the term "gene editing" as clearly negative; "gene therapy" is much, much worse.
- Twitter may not be the most approprite source by time of resolution, but I will try to find a broadly equivalnt source of popular opinion.
- When I look at statements of popular opinion, will at least 90% be positive or neutral? By default, I will treat technical statements of valid research as neutral, even if they show negative results or document risks.
- I will search for whatever term or terms are most commonly used in 2030.
