LA Mayoral Election: Court Rules 1st Round Fraudulent?
3.5 pt (24h)PoliticaOne-OffUS PoliticsCrime & JusticeElezione
PolymarketVerifica disponibilitàSenza KYC2% di commissioneDati di risoluzione verificatiBen calibratoProbabilità implicita attuale
No 80%-3.5pt
Qualità del mercato
33 / 100
Bassa qualitàVolume 24h
—
Liquidità
395,4 €
Bassa liquiditàBid / Ask
0.9% / 39.1%
Spread
38.2 pt
Spread ampioCommenti
2
Variazione 7g
+8.2 pts
Dati di mercato
Aggiornato 9 minuti fa
Trend
Mercati Correlati
Domande correlate per il contesto, non un confronto tra contratti equivalenti.
Court rules against NYC's pied-à-terre tax rollout in 2026?
KalshiWill a US court rule that the 2020 election was fraudulent?
PolymarketBrazilian presidential election: Renan Santos vote percent (1st Round)
KalshiBrazilian presidential election: Flávio Bolsonaro vote percent (1st Round)
KalshiBrazil 2026 Election: which pollsters stay within the margin for the top-2 in the 1st-round presidential election?
Manifold MarketsRevelstoke, BC Mayoral Election Winner
PolymarketRegole
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET.
- Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
- A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court.
- Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count.
- A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election.
- Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count.