By 2030, will gene editing to cure serious genetic diseases be seen as generally uncontroversial?
Salute e medicinaOne-Off4aManifold MarketsSenza KYCDati di risoluzione verificatiDiscretamente calibratoPrevisione della comunità attualeNo 79.3%
Previsori
47
Tipo di domanda
binary
Metodologia
Play-money forecasting platform
Tipo di fonte
Previsione
Dati di mercato
Aggiornato 6 ore fa
Obsoleto23 dic 22, 02:32 UTC31 dic 30, 23:59 UTC
Trend
Mercati Correlati
Domande correlate per il contesto, non un confronto tra contratti equivalenti.
Where will human germline gene editing resulting in a live birth first occur legally?
Manifold MarketsIn which year will the first baby be born as the result of legal germline gene editing?
Manifold Markets[ACX 2026] Will the US, UK or EU approve a gene editing therapy for a new condition during 2026?
Manifold MarketsWill the US, UK or EU approve a gene editing therapy for a new condition during 2026?
FutuurWill GiveWell research gene-editing mosquitoes to eradicate malaria?
Manifold MarketsWhen will the FDA reclassify BPC-157 to Category 1?
KalshiRegole
Many people do not currently see gene editing to cure e.g., cancer, sickle-cell, or down syndrom as a clear moral good that humanity should be persuing.
- Will this change by 2030?
- Currently, I count ~40% of the most recent tweets containing the term "gene editing" as clearly negative; "gene therapy" is much, much worse.
- Twitter may not be the most approprite source by time of resolution, but I will try to find a broadly equivalnt source of popular opinion.
- When I look at statements of popular opinion, will at least 90% be positive or neutral? By default, I will treat technical statements of valid research as neutral, even if they show negative results or document risks.
- I will search for whatever term or terms are most commonly used in 2030.
