Will SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?

US PoliticsOne-OffTecnologia2a

KalshiVerifica disponibilitàKYC richiesto2% di commissioneDati di risoluzione verificatiCalibrazione approssimativa

Avviso sulla qualità dei datiPrezzo non significativo

Dati al 27 lug 2026, 01:40 UTC · criterio pm-quality-3

Probabilità implicita attuale

No 100%

Qualita del mercato

39 / 100

Bassa qualità

Volume 24h

0 €

Liquidità

0 €

Bassa liquidità

Bid / Ask

74.0% / 81.0%

Spread

7.0 pt

Spread ampio

Dati di mercato

Aggiornato 17 minuti fa

23 lug 26, 14:001 ago 28, 14:00

Trend

Esito24hProbabilità

Sì

100%

Solo fondi simulati, nessun denaro realeNon è consulenza finanziaria

Esito scelto

Yes0%

Puntata (USDT)

Regole

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.

Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.
Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028.
A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes.
A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No.

Mercati Correlati

Will SCOTUS overturn or narrow Stinson deference to federal sentencing-guideline commentary?

48,4 €

Sì: 70%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS require 12-person juries for serious felonies?

4,4 €

Sì: 79%

KALSHI

Will the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?

0 €

Sì: 71%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?

0 €

Sì: 84%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?

0 €

Sì: 61%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS bar unpled affirmative defenses at summary judgment?

0 €

Sì: 66%

KALSHI

Attivi in questi argomenti

BitcoinBTC$63,399.27-3.25%

EthereumETH$1,881.18-4.40%

SolanaSOL$73.16-4.64%

DogecoinDOGE$0.0699-4.48%

BNBBNB$564.84-1.94%

XRPXRP$1.06-4.92%

Notizie Correlate

Google Ships New Gemini Flash Models, But Pro Is Still MissingDecrypt

Polymarket: Vance leads 2028 at 19.85% as pricing trend softensBlockchain.News

White House pushes Senate Democrats to take 'historic' crypto Clarity Act ethics dealCoindesk

Senate nears bipartisan CLARITY Act deal after ethics breakthroughCrypto News

Google Is Building an AI Chip Just for Gemini—And Investors Already Moved On ItDecrypt

White House agrees to ethics provisions in market structure billCointelegraph

Regole

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.

Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.
Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028.
A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes.
A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No.

Will SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?

US PoliticsOne-OffTecnologia2a

KalshiVerifica disponibilitàKYC richiesto2% di commissioneDati di risoluzione verificatiCalibrazione approssimativa

Avviso sulla qualità dei datiPrezzo non significativo

Dati al 27 lug 2026, 01:40 UTC · criterio pm-quality-3

Probabilità implicita attuale

No 100%

Qualita del mercato

39 / 100

Bassa qualità

Volume 24h

0 €

Liquidità

0 €

Bassa liquidità

Bid / Ask

74.0% / 81.0%

Spread

7.0 pt

Spread ampio

Dati di mercato

Aggiornato 17 minuti fa

23 lug 26, 14:001 ago 28, 14:00

Trend

Esito24hProbabilità

Sì

100%

Solo fondi simulati, nessun denaro realeNon è consulenza finanziaria

Esito scelto

Yes0%

Puntata (USDT)

Regole

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.

Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.
Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028.
A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes.
A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No.

Mercati Correlati

Will SCOTUS overturn or narrow Stinson deference to federal sentencing-guideline commentary?

48,4 €

Sì: 70%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS require 12-person juries for serious felonies?

4,4 €

Sì: 79%

KALSHI

Will the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?

0 €

Sì: 71%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?

0 €

Sì: 84%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?

0 €

Sì: 61%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS bar unpled affirmative defenses at summary judgment?

0 €

Sì: 66%

KALSHI

Attivi in questi argomenti

BitcoinBTC$63,399.27-3.25%

EthereumETH$1,881.18-4.40%

SolanaSOL$73.16-4.64%

DogecoinDOGE$0.0699-4.48%

BNBBNB$564.84-1.94%

XRPXRP$1.06-4.92%

Notizie Correlate

Google Ships New Gemini Flash Models, But Pro Is Still MissingDecrypt

Polymarket: Vance leads 2028 at 19.85% as pricing trend softensBlockchain.News

White House pushes Senate Democrats to take 'historic' crypto Clarity Act ethics dealCoindesk

Senate nears bipartisan CLARITY Act deal after ethics breakthroughCrypto News

Google Is Building an AI Chip Just for Gemini—And Investors Already Moved On ItDecrypt

White House agrees to ethics provisions in market structure billCointelegraph

Regole

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.

Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v.
Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028.
A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes.
A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No.