Will evidence come to light by 2028 that microplastics have meaningfully lowered testosterone levels? (READ DESCRIPTION)
One-OffSanté et médecineScience2aManifold MarketsSans KYCDonnées de résolution vérifiéesAssez bien calibréPrévision communautaire actuelleNon 98.2%
Prévisionnistes
12
Type de question
binary
Méthodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Type de source
Prévision
Données du marché
Mis à jour il y a 5 heures
Obsolète30 déc. 24, 15:58 UTC1 janv. 29, 04:59 UTC
Tendances
Règles
Inspired by this tweet: https://x.com/esyudkowsky/status/1873740847159845193?s=46&t=62uT9IruD1-YP-SHFkVEPg
- This resolves YES if a scientific consensus (or even something halfway to a scientific consensus, like a leading theory that is covered substantially in the press, or several well-received, seemingly conclusive, and influential Nature/Science papers, etc) emerges that (1) testosterone levels are indeed declining on a societal level and this isn’t due to changing measurement standards, sampling bias in historical data, etc. and (2) microplastics are a leading cause (or one of several leading causes) of this.
- Things that will not be sufficient for a resolution:
- -studies showing that when you dose mice with high levels of microplastics, it affects their hormones (obviously it could)
- -individual journal articles (even a large number of them) that conclude one way or the other on this matter (I’m sure there will be tons of these, don’t be a “man of a single study”), especially those of the current paradigm which make broad claims from pinpoint experiments or correlational studies
- -a political consensus
