Before 2029
KalshiComprobar disponibilidadKYC requeridoDatos de resolución verificadosBien calibradoPunto medio del libro seleccionado
Sí · —
Cargando el libro seleccionado…
—
Precio guardado
Sí 55.5%
Sí 55.5%Calidad del mercado
26 / 100
Baja calidadVolumen 24h
11,5 €
Interés abierto
210,4 US$
Interés abierto bajoCompra / Venta
— / —
SíSpread
—
Datos de mercado
Actualizado hace 52 minutos
Retrasado2 sept 26, 3:00 UTC1 ene 29, 4:59 UTC
El gráfico y los cambios muestran probabilidades históricas guardadas, no el libro seleccionado en directo.
Tendencias
Fila seleccionada: punto medio del libro. Otras filas: referencias guardadas, posiblemente normalizadas; los cambios de 24h usan el historial guardado.
Condiciones de la plataforma
Fuente: Kalshi
Estas condiciones son informativas; las operaciones simuladas de CoinRithm siguen sus propias reglas.
- Cierre anticipado:
- Sí
- Plazo de liquidación:
- 30m (informativo)
Profundidad de mercado · Sí
Cargando el libro seleccionado…
—
Mercados Relacionados
Preguntas relacionadas para dar contexto, no una comparación de contratos equivalentes.
FTC antitrust case against Meta revived on appeal?
KalshiWill there be a terrorist attack against OpenAI before 2027?
Manifold MarketsWill The New York Times win its copyright infringement suit against OpenAI and Microsoft?
Manifold MarketsWhich of the following lawsuits will prevail against OpenAI?
Manifold MarketsWill the New York Times (NYT) achieve a favorable outcome in its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft?
Manifold MarketsWill Anthropic’s valuation hit __ by December 31?
PolymarketReglas
La regla exacta de este resultado no está disponible.
Liquida mediante:U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- For this market, the case is Apple Inc. v. Chang Liu, Tang Yew Tan, OpenAI Foundation f/k/a OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI Group PBC, and io Products, LLC f/k/a io Products, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California No. 5:26-cv-07078-EJD. Apple Inc. achieves the superior outcome through the following exclusive hierarchy: Net Monetary Recovery (Highest Priority): Apple Inc. achieves the superior outcome if it receives a larger net monetary award than all opposing parties combined (after offsetting any awards against Apple Inc.). Attorney's fees and costs are excluded. Substantive Legal Victory (Second Priority): If no net monetary advantage exists, Apple Inc. achieves the superior outcome if it prevails on claims seeking the largest dollar amount of relief in its original pleadings, or if relief amounts are equal or unclear, on the greater number of primary causes of action. Case Termination Advantage (Third Priority): If the case terminates without substantive judgment, Apple Inc. achieves the superior outcome if opposing parties voluntarily dismiss all claims against Apple Inc. with prejudice. All other termination scenarios result in no superior outcome for any party. Settlements: Apple Inc. achieves the superior outcome if the parties settle with a disclosed net payment to Apple Inc. Apple Inc. does not achieve the superior outcome if the parties settle with a disclosed net payment from Apple Inc. to opposing parties. No party achieves a superior outcome if the parties settle with mutual releases and no disclosed payment direction, or if settlement terms are sealed and no Source Agency reports payment direction within seven days of the settlement announcement. Key exclusions: Applies only to trial-level resolution and specifically excludes all appeals processes. Procedural victories alone do not constitute superior outcomes. A temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or expedited-discovery order is not a final trial-level resolution. A denial, partial ruling, or dismissal that leaves claims pending on a motion to dismiss is not final; a final dismissal terminating the entire trial-level action is evaluated under the hierarchy above.
Reglas de cada resultado
- Yes
- La regla exacta de este resultado no está disponible.
- No
- La regla exacta de este resultado no está disponible.