Qual é o preço atual de Zilliqa?
O preço atual de Zilliqa é 0,002508 € com uma variação de 6,80% nas últimas 24 horas.
Zilliqa is a public smart contract platform that grew out of academic research into sharding, and it was among the first live networks to split its validator set into parallel groups so throughput could grow with participation. Its mainnet launched on 31 January 2019 with Scilla, a safety focused contract language of its own design. In June 2025 the project completed a full protocol rewrite, Zilliqa 2.0, which moved consensus to proof of stake and added a native Ethereum Virtual Machine layer alongside Scilla. ZIL pays gas and secures the network through staking.
Official resources:
Zilliqa began as a research project connected to the National University of Singapore. The founding group is commonly identified as including Xinshu Dong, Prateek Saxena, Amrit Kumar and Yaoqi Jia. Zilliqa Research was incorporated in 2017 and the mainnet went live in January 2019. Leadership and corporate structure have changed several times since, and development now runs under the Zilliqa Group banner, so the current team page is a better source than founding era coverage.
The original design cut the validator set into shards, each processing a separate slice of transactions in parallel. Zilliqa 2.0 replaced most of that. Consensus is now proof of stake using Pipelined Fast-HotStuff, a variant in which finalization is pipelined across rounds, with blocks typically final after two confirmations and block times of roughly two seconds.
Sharding was reworked into x-shards: configurable shard chains provisioned for particular applications, each running its own consensus instance under either proof of stake or proof of authority while still communicating with the main chain. Execution supports native EVM contracts alongside Scilla.
ZIL pays gas in both the Scilla and EVM environments, and since the 2.0 upgrade it is the staking asset: validators bond ZIL to produce and finalize blocks, and holders who do not run a node can delegate and share rewards minus the validator's commission. Zilliqa states that 2.0 tokenomics reduce issuance relative to the earlier mining model, and the proof of work block rewards of Zilliqa 1.0 no longer apply.
Zilliqa was among the first live public chains to implement network sharding at scale rather than describe it in a paper, and it shipped a purpose designed contract language instead of adopting Solidity. Scilla's separation of computing logic from state changing logic targets the class of bugs that has drained value from contracts elsewhere.
Compared with Algorand, which also came from academic research, Zilliqa's emphasis was throughput through sharding rather than consensus theory. Compared with Neo, Qtum, Conflux and aelf, the differentiators are the dual language execution environment and the x-shard model. Compared with newer high throughput chains, Zilliqa is an older network that had to migrate an existing user base, validator set and contract ecosystem rather than launch fresh.
Security rests on proof of stake, where voting power and rewards scale with bonded ZIL, making an attack expensive in proportion to committed capital. Pipelined Fast-HotStuff provides Byzantine fault tolerant finality, so a finalized block is not exposed to the reorganization risk of proof of work chains. The 2.0 protocol ran through an extended external test phase before the transition.
The largest practical risk is relevance. Zilliqa launched into a very different competitive field than the one it now occupies, its developer mindshare has been modest next to leading EVM chains, and adding EVM support is a catch up move competing for builders with many alternatives. The transition also changed the economics for the previous mining community and required migration work from existing projects. X-shards are flexible, but a shard secured by proof of authority or a thin stake pool is not as strong as the main chain.
Zilliqa is one of the clearest cases of a research idea carried from paper to production, demonstrating sharded transaction processing on a live public chain years before the approach became common. Its second act is a useful test of whether an established chain can modernize its foundations without losing the applications already running on it.
ZIL is listed on a broad set of centralized exchanges against major fiat currencies and stablecoins, and is available on decentralized venues both natively and through its BNB Chain representation. Because ZIL exists in more than one form, confirm which network you are withdrawing to, since sending it to the wrong address type can cause permanent loss.
Native ZIL is held in Zilliqa compatible wallets, and since the 2.0 upgrade standard Ethereum wallets can also be used by adding the network's RPC details for the EVM layer. Hardware wallets with Zilliqa support keep private keys offline and are the stronger option for long term holdings. If you intend to stake, review the validator you delegate to, since commission and uptime vary.
Acompanhe o preço ao vivo de Zilliqa, gráfico, capitalização e volume em tempo real. Pratique mock trading e demo trading de Zilliqa na CoinRithm antes de usar dinheiro real.
Use uma conta de paper trading cripto para fazer demo trading de Zilliqa com precos em tempo real, feedback de trade com IA e ligas de trading. Teste estrategias, aprenda gestao de risco e ganhe confianca antes de negociar Zilliqa com dinheiro real.
Leia o guia completo de paper tradingO preço atual de Zilliqa é 0,002508 € com uma variação de 6,80% nas últimas 24 horas.
O volume diário de negociação é 947 365 € representando uma variação de 214,20% nas últimas 24 horas.
A capitalização de mercado de Zilliqa é 48 935 318 €, ocupando a posição #283 globalmente.
A avaliação totalmente diluída (FDV) de Zilliqa é 52 662 975 €, calculada assumindo o fornecimento máximo de 21 000 000 000 ZIL.
Em circulação: 19 513 551 525. Total: 20 578 802 560. Máximo: 21 000 000 000.
Nas últimas 24 horas, Zilliqa foi negociado entre um mínimo de 0,002323 € e um máximo de 0,00254 €.

Zilliqa halted native ZIL transactions after a Ledger app flaw exposed private keys, while Upbit placed ZIL under cautionary trading status.

A security vulnerability in the Zilliqa Ledger app is enabling attackers to reconstruct private keys using publicly available onchain data.