Will I still think ergocidity economics is crankery at the end of March 2027?
One-OffMacro en economie5mndManifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdHuidige gemeenschapsvoorspellingJa 97%
Voorspellers
2
Vraagtype
binary
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 8 uur geleden
Verouderd17 mrt 26, 06:52 UTC31 mrt 27, 23:59 UTC
Trends
Gerelateerde Markten
Gerelateerde vragen voor context, geen vergelijking van gelijkwaardige contracten.
LLMs widely used in economics modeling by the end of 2026?
Manifold MarketsWill Robin Hanson receive the Nobel Prize in Economics?
Manifold MarketsBillionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026?
PolymarketJobs numbers in October 2026?
KalshiWill GameStop acquire eBay in 2026?
KalshiPort of New York and New Jersey container volume in 2026
KalshiRegels
Presently I think ergocidity economics (Ole Peters's theory about how looking at the behavior over time of single rollouts of a random process is better than textbook expected utility calculations over the distribution of all possible rollouts) is probably crankery.
- Other mathematically inclined people, including ones I have some reason to respect, feel differently.
- This market is to help me decide whether to be louder in public about this view and to provide a prize of valuable internet points to anyone who talks me around within a year.
- I intend to resolve YES or NO (currently I intend to resolve YES) but may resolve PROB if I feel nontrivially unsure.
- The last time I spent much brainpower on Ole Peters: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/gptXmhJxFiEwuPN98/meetup-notes-ole-peters-on-ergodicity#Paper__The_time_resolution_of_the_St_Petersburg_Paradox