Will Emmett Shear's new company make important and central contributions to AI alignment?
One-OffAI4j
Manifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdWaarschuwing datakwaliteitVerouderde gegevens
Gegevens van 26 okt 2026, 07:40 UTC · beleid pm-quality-4
Huidige gemeenschapsvoorspellingNee 79.9%
Voorspellers
14
Vraagtype
binary
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt gisteren
Verouderd29 mrt 25, 20:45 UTC31 dec 30, 23:59 UTC
Trends
Gerelateerde Markten
Gerelateerde vragen voor context, geen vergelijking van gelijkwaardige contracten.
Whose P(Doom) is higher: Emmett Shear (YES) or Sam Altman (NO)?
Manifold MarketsIs Emmett Shear the interim ex-CEO of OpenAI?
Manifold MarketsWill the President of the United States of America admit to using AI to help make an important decision before 2028 ends
Manifold MarketsWhich major technology company will make the most significant quantum computing breakthrough by 2030?
Manifold MarketsWhen will Anthropic officially announce an IPO?
KalshiWhich company has the best AI model end of October?
PolymarketRegels
https://www.corememory.com/p/exclusive-emmett-shear-is-back-with-softmax
- This is obviously a very ambiguous and subjective question, I'd rather have an imperfect market than none
- Close date extends indefinitely until the answer to this is clear.
- "Central" is a high bar.
- Example: Inventing a better interpretability tool or a better method of reinforcement learning isn't enough to resolve this market YES, even if they're genuinely better than the alternatives and everyone adopts them.
- The most central YES resolution is is if their "organic alignment" works and is adopted by everyone, but it being a part of a future widely adopted alignment solution, or being widely accepted by AI safety as an important alignment innovation but not used, would work too.