Will any of OpenAI’s massive release of mathematical results be shown to be flawed by the end of November?
AIOne-Off
Manifold MarketsGeslotenGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdDeze markt is beslist: Yes (99%)
Afgewikkeld: 8 okt 2026, 11:37
Door provider geverifieerde afwikkeling
CoinRithm heeft provider-onderbouwd bewijs voor de winnaar en afwikkelingstijd van deze markt.
Winnende Uitkomst
Yes
Op 7 dagen afstand
—
Op 24 uur afstand
37%
VerrassingWaarschuwing datakwaliteitVerouderde gegevens
Gegevens van 8 okt 2026, 21:51 UTC · beleid pm-quality-4
Waarschijnlijkheidstijdlijn
Yes99%
No1%
Gewonnen
Verloren
Gerelateerde Markten
Gerelateerde vragen voor context, geen vergelijking van gelijkwaardige contracten.
Which of OpenAI's claimed math results will be shown to be flawed before 2027?
Manifold MarketsWill any of Levent Alpöge’s mathematical results with Claude be proven flawed by the end of the year?
Manifold MarketsOpenAI's proof of zero free region of Riemann zeta for Re(s)>7/8 shown to be flawed before 2027?
Manifold MarketsBest AI at the end of 2026?
KalshiWhich company has the best AI model end of October?
PolymarketWhich company has best AI model end of 2026?
PolymarketRegels
[tweet]YES if, by November 30, there is a consensus in credible reporting or within the academic community that at least one of the core arguments, theorems, or proofs in OpenAI's GitHub repo is fatally flawed or incorrect.
- Otherwise, resolves NO.
- "Flawed" means a core mathematical or theoretical error is identified that invalidates the main result of the paper, and the error is either unfixable or difficult to patch.
- Nitpicks—such as minor typos, formatting errors, minor translation gaps in the Lean formalization that do not undermine the mathematical proof's validity, or easily patchable edge cases—do not count toward a YES resolution.
- The flaw has to be in the repo as it is released today - later hotfixes don’t remove an eligible flaw, but later additions don’t count either.