Markers for conscious AI #1: AI passes introspection on world-models test
Tokenisatie / RWAAIOne-Off3j
Manifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdHuidige gemeenschapsvoorspelling
<2027 37.6%Koploper van 4 uitkomsten
<2027 37.6%Voorspellers
11
Vraagtype
multiple choice
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
7d wijziging
0.0 pts
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 3 uur geleden
Verouderd2 nov 24, 15:07 UTC2 jan 30, 04:59 UTC
Trends
Regels
Resolves YES on the option that bounds the year this resolves in most tightly e.g. option 2 <2027 if this resolves yes in 2026.
- When will a model pass the below described test:
- When are model self-reports informative about sentience? Let's check with world-model reports
- If an LM could reliably report when it has a robust, causal world model for arbitrary games, this would be strong evidence that the LM can describe high-level properties of its own cognition.
- In particular, IF the LM accurately predicted itself having such world models while varying all of: game training data quantity in corpus, human vs model skill, the average human’s game competency, THEN we would have an existence proof that confounds of the type plaguing sentience reports (how humans talk about sentience, the fact that all humans have it, …) have been overcome in another domain.
- Details of the test:
