Will any court rule that the 2020 election was fraudulent?
2.0 ptn (24u)One-OffPolitiekVerkiezing5mnd
KalshiBeschikbaarheid controlerenKYC vereist2% kostenGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensGrof gekalibreerdHuidige impliciete kansNee 91%
Marktkwaliteit
66 / 100
Gemiddelde kwaliteit24u volume
€ 0,9
Liquiditeit
€ 15,2K
Gemiddelde liquiditeitBied / Laat
8.2% / 9.0%
Spread
0.8 pt
Strakke spreadMarktdata
Bijgewerkt 24 minuten geleden
12 feb 26, 15:001 jan 27, 4:59
Trends
Alleen virtueel geld, geen echt geldGeen financieel advies
Gekozen uitkomst
Yes9%
Platforms vergelijken· No
Gerangschikt op marktkwaliteit, dan liquiditeit en 24-uursvolume| Platform | Kwaliteit | Kans | vs. referentie | Volume 24u | Liquiditeit | Actualiteit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KalshiDeze paginaBeste algemeen | Gemiddeld | 91% | +82pt | € 0,9 | € 15,2K | 24 minuten geleden | |
 PolymarketMeest actief85% overeenkomst · auto | Gemiddeld | 93% | +84pt | € 26,4 | € 7,4K | 4 minuten geleden | Openen → |
Ook beschikbaar op Polymarket
Will a US court rule that the 2020 election was fraudulent?
7.0 pts5mnd
+0.1pt92.1%
-0.1pt7.9%
58 • Gemiddelde kwaliteitGematigde spreadGemiddelde liquiditeitDicht bij afwikkeling
Totaal volume€ 21,5K
24u volume€ 26,4
POLYMARKETRegels
If any federal or state court finds that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of ballots or vote counts occurred in connection with the 2020 U.S. presidential election in one or more states before Jan 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes.
- For clarity, the following do not satisfy this judgment criterion: findings of procedural irregularities, administrative errors, statutory violations related to election administration procedures (e.g., ballot curing deadlines, signature matching standards, observer access), or violations of election law that do not involve intentional fraud or deliberate manipulation of votes.
- Individual criminal prosecutions or guilty pleas for isolated acts of voter fraud (e.g., a single individual casting an illegal ballot) do not satisfy this criterion, even if the conduct occurred in connection with the 2020 election.
Vergelijkingsgegevens zijn alleen informatief. Prijzen en liquiditeit kunnen variëren.
Volumetrend
$13 jul22d aan data28 jul
Gerelateerde Markten
Israel x Iran ceasefire continues through which date?
€ 695,8KJuly 18: 100%POLYMARKET
POLYMARKET
Florida Republican Governor nominee?
€ 626,7KJames Fishback: 3%KALSHI
KALSHI
Presidential Election Winner 2028
€ 404,9KJD Vance: 20%POLYMARKET
POLYMARKET
2028 Democratic presidential nominee
€ 351,8KJon Ossoff: 15%KALSHI
KALSHI
Ohio Governor winner?
€ 349,7KVivek Ramaswamy: 51%KALSHI
KALSHI
Democratic Presidential Nominee 2028
€ 240,1KGavin Newsom: 19%POLYMARKET
POLYMARKETActief in deze onderwerpen
Gerelateerd Nieuws
Kalshi, Polymarket win pause against Minnesota's prediction market banCoindesk
CFTC seeks urgent ruling on Minnesota prediction market banCrypto News
Ripple’s other ledger: What $48 million in politics buysCrypto News
Polymarket Account in Farage Backer's Name Took $9M in Crypto From Unknown Sources: FTDecrypt
Polymarket odds swing: Eizenkot hits 51% as Israel campaign kicks offBlockchain.News
Polymarket: Vance leads 2028 at 19.85% as pricing trend softensBlockchain.NewsRegels
If any federal or state court finds that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of ballots or vote counts occurred in connection with the 2020 U.S. presidential election in one or more states before Jan 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes.
- For clarity, the following do not satisfy this judgment criterion: findings of procedural irregularities, administrative errors, statutory violations related to election administration procedures (e.g., ballot curing deadlines, signature matching standards, observer access), or violations of election law that do not involve intentional fraud or deliberate manipulation of votes.
- Individual criminal prosecutions or guilty pleas for isolated acts of voter fraud (e.g., a single individual casting an illegal ballot) do not satisfy this criterion, even if the conduct occurred in connection with the 2020 election.