Will any frontier AI lab publicly commit to a Human Preservation constraint in model architecture before 2027?
Politique américaineOne-OffIATech2mois
Manifold MarketsSans KYCDonnées de résolution vérifiéesAssez bien calibréPrévision communautaire actuelleNon 69.2%
Prévisionnistes
2
Type de question
binary
Méthodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Type de source
Prévision
Données du marché
Mis à jour il y a 1 heure
En retard21 oct. 26, 09:52 UTC31 déc. 26, 23:59 UTC
Tendances
Règles
Principle 1 of the DarkMatter Optimist framework: if Human Preservation isn't the architecture, it isn't preservation.
- A constraint bolted on - a prompt, a filter, a policy page - can be unbolted by the lab, the market, or the state.
- Context: the White House Accord is voluntary - its four layers are audits and oversight, process controls; none architectural.
- EO 14434 (Sept 29, 2026) reframes AI as "Super Intelligence." The FRONTIER Act, with audits, remains pending.
- It was a mistake not to have this from the start.
- We did not know what went into the training data or the code.
