KalshiClosedCheck availabilityKYC requiredVerified resolution dataWell calibratedThis market resolved: Lilli Tagger (86%)
Resolved: Oct 31, 2026, 12:12 PM
Provider-verified resolution
CoinRithm has provider-backed winner and settlement-time evidence for this market.
Winning Outcome
Lilli Tagger
At 7 days out
—
At 24 hours out
—
Data quality warningStale data
Data as of Oct 31, 2026, 11:37 AM UTC · policy pm-quality-4
Probability Timeline
Kaitlin Quevedo14%
Lilli Tagger86%
Lilli TaggerWon
Kaitlin QuevedoLost
Rules
If Lilli Tagger wins set 1 in the Kaitlin Quevedo vs Lilli Tagger professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA Guangzhou Semifinal, then the market resolves to Yes.
Settles via:WTA
- The following market refers to the Kaitlin Quevedo vs Lilli Tagger professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA Guangzhou Semifinal. If the match does not occur (signaled by a ball being played) due to a player injury, walkover, forfeiture, or any other cancellation (all before the match starts), the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with the rules. If this match is postponed or delayed, the market will remain open and close after the rescheduled match has finished (within two weeks). If a retirement occurs, all markets that can be unconditionally settled based on play already completed will resolve accordingly. Any markets that cannot be unconditionally settled will resolve to Fair Market Price, as determined at the sole discretion of the Exchange. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
Rules for each outcome
- Lilli Tagger
- If Lilli Tagger wins set 1 in the Kaitlin Quevedo vs Lilli Tagger professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA Guangzhou Semifinal, then the market resolves to Yes.
- Kaitlin Quevedo
- If Kaitlin Quevedo wins set 1 in the Kaitlin Quevedo vs Lilli Tagger professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA Guangzhou Semifinal, then the market resolves to Yes.
