KalshiClosedCheck availabilityKYC requiredVerified resolution dataWell calibratedThis market resolved: Jil Teichmann (33%)
Resolved: Oct 29, 2026, 6:47 AM
Provider-verified resolution
CoinRithm has provider-backed winner and settlement-time evidence for this market.
Winning Outcome
Jil Teichmann
At 7 days out
—
At 24 hours out
—
Data quality warningStale data
Data as of Oct 29, 2026, 5:45 AM UTC · policy pm-quality-4
Probability Timeline
Zeynep Sonmez64%
Jil Teichmann33%
Zeynep SonmezLost
Jil TeichmannWon
Rules
If Jil Teichmann wins set 2 in the Jil Teichmann vs Zeynep Sonmez professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA Guangzhou Round Of 16, then the market resolves to Yes.
Settles via:WTA
- The following market refers to the Jil Teichmann vs Zeynep Sonmez professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA Guangzhou Round Of 16. If the match does not occur (signaled by a ball being played) due to a player injury, walkover, forfeiture, or any other cancellation (all before the match starts), the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with the rules. If this match is postponed or delayed, the market will remain open and close after the rescheduled match has finished (within two weeks). If a retirement occurs, all markets that can be unconditionally settled based on play already completed will resolve accordingly. Any markets that cannot be unconditionally settled will resolve to Fair Market Price, as determined at the sole discretion of the Exchange. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
Rules for each outcome
- Zeynep Sonmez
- If Zeynep Sonmez wins set 2 in the Jil Teichmann vs Zeynep Sonmez professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA Guangzhou Round Of 16, then the market resolves to Yes.
- Jil Teichmann
- If Jil Teichmann wins set 2 in the Jil Teichmann vs Zeynep Sonmez professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA Guangzhou Round Of 16, then the market resolves to Yes.