KalshiClosedCheck availabilityKYC requiredVerified resolution dataWell calibratedThis market resolved: Daniel Milavsky (94%)
Resolved: Nov 1, 2026, 5:57 PM
Provider-verified resolution
CoinRithm has provider-backed winner and settlement-time evidence for this market.
Winning Outcome
Daniel Milavsky
At 7 days out
—
At 24 hours out
—
Data quality warningStale data
Data as of Nov 1, 2026, 5:33 PM UTC · policy pm-quality-4
Probability Timeline
Joshua Charlton7%
Daniel Milavsky94%
Daniel MilavskyWon
Joshua CharltonLost
Related Markets
Related questions for context, not a comparison of equivalent contracts.
Rules
If Daniel Milavsky wins the Milavsky vs Charlton professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Charlottesville Qualification Round 1 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
Settles via:ATP
- The following market refers to the Milavsky vs Charlton professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Charlottesville Qualification Round 1 after a ball has been played. If the match does not occur (signaled by a ball being played) due to a player injury, walkover, forfeiture, or any other cancellation (all before the match starts), the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with the rules. If this match is postponed or delayed, the market will remain open and close after the rescheduled match has finished (within two weeks). Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
Rules for each outcome
- Daniel Milavsky
- If Daniel Milavsky wins the Milavsky vs Charlton professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Charlottesville Qualification Round 1 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
- Joshua Charlton
- If Joshua Charlton wins the Milavsky vs Charlton professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Charlottesville Qualification Round 1 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
