Will SCOTUS let people seek green cards after their asylum is terminated?

US PoliticsOne-Off2y

KalshiKullanılabilirliği kontrol etKYC gerekli%2 ücretDoğrulanmış sonuçlanma verisiKabaca kalibre

Veri kalitesi uyarısıAnlamlı fiyatlandırma yok

28 Tem 2026 13:30 UTC itibarıyla veriler · politika pm-quality-3

Güncel ima edilen olasılık

Hayır 100%

Piyasa kalitesi

39 / 100

Düşük kalite

24s Hacim

₺0

Likidite

₺0

Düşük likidite

Alis / Satis

32.0% / 39.0%

Spread

7.0 pt

Geniş spread

Piyasa verileri

21 dakika önce guncellendi

24 Tem 26 0:001 Ağu 28 14:00

Trendler

Sonuç24sOlasılık

Evet

Hayır

100%

Yalnızca sanal bakiye, gerçek para yokYatırım tavsiyesi değildir

Seçilen sonuç

Yes0%

Tutar (USDT)

Kurallar

If the Supreme Court, in Wassily v.

Blanche, rules termination of a noncitizen’s asylum does not categorically bar that person from seeking adjustment to lawful permanent resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b), then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that noncitizens who were granted asylum, but whose asylum was later terminated, are not categorically ineligible for adjustment to lawful permanent resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b), after Issuance and before August 1, 2028.
The market resolves to No if the Court holds that such noncitizens are categorically ineligible.
If the Court dismisses the writ as improvidently granted, dismisses the case, remands without resolving this question, or otherwise disposes of the case without a merits ruling on this issue, the market resolves to No.

İlgili Piyasalar

Will the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?

₺0

Evet: 71%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?

₺0

Evet: 84%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?

₺0

Evet: 61%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?

₺0

Evet: 0%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS bar unpled affirmative defenses at summary judgment?

₺0

Evet: 66%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS count subscribers to a video provider’s non-video offerings as VPPA consumers?

₺0

Evet: 44%

KALSHI

Bu konularda aktif

BitcoinBTC$63,891.34+0.62%

EthereumETH$1,904.94+1.00%

SolanaSOL$73.37-0.06%

DogecoinDOGE$0.0705+0.69%

XRPXRP$1.08+2.26%

BNBBNB$568.37+0.41%

İlgili Haberler

Polymarket: Vance leads 2028 at 19.85% as pricing trend softensBlockchain.News

White House pushes Senate Democrats to take 'historic' crypto Clarity Act ethics dealCoindesk

Senate nears bipartisan CLARITY Act deal after ethics breakthroughCrypto News

White House agrees to ethics provisions in market structure billCointelegraph

Polymarket odds show Vance at 19.85% as Epstein files critique hits tapeBlockchain.News

Dick Durbin accuses Todd Blanche of shielding Trump’s crypto empireCrypto News

Kurallar

If the Supreme Court, in Wassily v.

Blanche, rules termination of a noncitizen’s asylum does not categorically bar that person from seeking adjustment to lawful permanent resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b), then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that noncitizens who were granted asylum, but whose asylum was later terminated, are not categorically ineligible for adjustment to lawful permanent resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b), after Issuance and before August 1, 2028.
The market resolves to No if the Court holds that such noncitizens are categorically ineligible.
If the Court dismisses the writ as improvidently granted, dismisses the case, remands without resolving this question, or otherwise disposes of the case without a merits ruling on this issue, the market resolves to No.

Will SCOTUS let people seek green cards after their asylum is terminated?

US PoliticsOne-Off2y

KalshiKullanılabilirliği kontrol etKYC gerekli%2 ücretDoğrulanmış sonuçlanma verisiKabaca kalibre

Veri kalitesi uyarısıAnlamlı fiyatlandırma yok

28 Tem 2026 13:30 UTC itibarıyla veriler · politika pm-quality-3

Güncel ima edilen olasılık

Hayır 100%

Piyasa kalitesi

39 / 100

Düşük kalite

24s Hacim

₺0

Likidite

₺0

Düşük likidite

Alis / Satis

32.0% / 39.0%

Spread

7.0 pt

Geniş spread

Piyasa verileri

21 dakika önce guncellendi

24 Tem 26 0:001 Ağu 28 14:00

Trendler

Sonuç24sOlasılık

Evet

Hayır

100%

Yalnızca sanal bakiye, gerçek para yokYatırım tavsiyesi değildir

Seçilen sonuç

Yes0%

Tutar (USDT)

Kurallar

If the Supreme Court, in Wassily v.

Blanche, rules termination of a noncitizen’s asylum does not categorically bar that person from seeking adjustment to lawful permanent resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b), then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that noncitizens who were granted asylum, but whose asylum was later terminated, are not categorically ineligible for adjustment to lawful permanent resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b), after Issuance and before August 1, 2028.
The market resolves to No if the Court holds that such noncitizens are categorically ineligible.
If the Court dismisses the writ as improvidently granted, dismisses the case, remands without resolving this question, or otherwise disposes of the case without a merits ruling on this issue, the market resolves to No.

İlgili Piyasalar

Will the Supreme Court bar Boulder’s state-law climate claims against Suncor and Exxon?

₺0

Evet: 71%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?

₺0

Evet: 84%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS allow Arizona’s citizenship-proof and pre-election noncitizen-removal rules?

₺0

Evet: 61%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?

₺0

Evet: 0%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS bar unpled affirmative defenses at summary judgment?

₺0

Evet: 66%

KALSHI

Will SCOTUS count subscribers to a video provider’s non-video offerings as VPPA consumers?

₺0

Evet: 44%

KALSHI

Bu konularda aktif

BitcoinBTC$63,891.34+0.62%

EthereumETH$1,904.94+1.00%

SolanaSOL$73.37-0.06%

DogecoinDOGE$0.0705+0.69%

XRPXRP$1.08+2.26%

BNBBNB$568.37+0.41%

İlgili Haberler

Polymarket: Vance leads 2028 at 19.85% as pricing trend softensBlockchain.News

White House pushes Senate Democrats to take 'historic' crypto Clarity Act ethics dealCoindesk

Senate nears bipartisan CLARITY Act deal after ethics breakthroughCrypto News

White House agrees to ethics provisions in market structure billCointelegraph

Polymarket odds show Vance at 19.85% as Epstein files critique hits tapeBlockchain.News

Dick Durbin accuses Todd Blanche of shielding Trump’s crypto empireCrypto News

Kurallar

If the Supreme Court, in Wassily v.

Blanche, rules termination of a noncitizen’s asylum does not categorically bar that person from seeking adjustment to lawful permanent resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b), then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that noncitizens who were granted asylum, but whose asylum was later terminated, are not categorically ineligible for adjustment to lawful permanent resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b), after Issuance and before August 1, 2028.
The market resolves to No if the Court holds that such noncitizens are categorically ineligible.
If the Court dismisses the writ as improvidently granted, dismisses the case, remands without resolving this question, or otherwise disposes of the case without a merits ruling on this issue, the market resolves to No.