Will prominent rationalists judge that Trump's second term was the most positively impactful term in the last 68 years?
One-OffAmerikaanse politiekPolitiek2jManifold MarketsGeen KYCGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensRedelijk gekalibreerdHuidige gemeenschapsvoorspellingNee 90%
Voorspellers
130
Vraagtype
binary
Methodologie
Play-money forecasting platform
Brontype
Voorspelling
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 47 minuten geleden
Vertraagd9 nov 24, 19:16 UTC2 nov 28, 06:59 UTC
Trends
Gerelateerde Markten
Gerelateerde vragen voor context, geen vergelijking van gelijkwaardige contracten.
Will prominent rationalists judge that Trump's second term was the most damaging term in the last 68 years?
Manifold MarketsWhat will happen during Trump's second term?
Manifold MarketsWhat will Trump do during his second term (2025–2029)?
Manifold MarketsWill a Supreme Court justice retire during Trump’s second term?
Manifold MarketsHow many articles will Trump be impeached on in his second term?
KalshiHow many executive orders will Trump sign in his second term?
KalshiRegels
This will be resolved based on my judgement of the vibes of top Rationalist voices in 4 years.
- If through their Tweets and Substack posts, I get the sense that they are happy with Trump's reforms, and that what got done was extremely impactful, vastly outweighs any harms, and was more sizable than what other post WWII presidents have accomplished, then I will resolve YES.
- Otherwise, NO.
- EDIT: This would be judged from 1960 with JFK (68 years before 2028).
- Update 2025-02-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Majority Requirement Clarification:
- A majority of prominent rationalists must hold the view that Trump’s second term was the most positively impactful since 1960.
