Will a court invalidate or enjoin Nikki Lucas's election as Brooklyn Dem chair?
PolitiekOne-OffAmerikaanse politiekVerkiezing19dBefore Nov 1, 2026
KalshiBeschikbaarheid controlerenKYC vereistGeverifieerde afwikkelingsgegevensGoed gekalibreerdMiddenprijs van geselecteerd orderboek
Ja · —
Geselecteerd orderboek laden…
—
Opgeslagen prijs
Ja 74.5%
Ja 74.5%Marktkwaliteit
38 / 100
Lage kwaliteit24u volume
—
Open interest
€ 2,2K
Lage open interestBied / Laat
— / —
JaSpread
—
Marktdata
Bijgewerkt 10 minuten geleden
5 okt 26, 21:00 UTC1 nov 26, 03:59 UTC
Grafiek en wijzigingen tonen opgeslagen historische kansen, niet het geselecteerde actuele orderboek.
Trends
Geselecteerde rij: middenprijs van het orderboek. Andere rijen: opgeslagen, mogelijk genormaliseerde referenties; wijzigingen over 24 uur gebruiken opgeslagen historie.
Voorwaarden van het handelsplatform
Bron: Kalshi
Deze voorwaarden zijn ter informatie; voor gesimuleerd handelen bij CoinRithm gelden eigen regels.
- Vervroegde sluiting:
- Ja
- Afwikkelingstermijn:
- 30m (ter informatie)
Marktdiepte · Ja
Geselecteerd orderboek laden…
—
Regels
De exacte regel voor deze uitkomst is niet beschikbaar.
Afwikkeling via:New York State Unified Court System
- The ruling must: Be issued by any New York State court in the Kings County Supreme Court litigation over the Brooklyn Democratic Party's leadership, any appeal of that litigation, or any other action challenging Lucas's election as chair Address the matter described by the specified judgment Be issued through a written order, opinion, judgment, or decision Partial relief counts. A written temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or stay whose operative terms bar Nikki Lucas from serving or acting as chair, or bar the Brooklyn Democratic Party from recognizing her as chair, qualifies even if it is interim or limited in scope. A ruling that only voids the party's rule amendments or only decides who holds interim authority does not qualify unless it also invalidates or enjoins Lucas's election or service as chair. A written ruling that declares the Oct. 4, 2026 executive committee vote void or without effect, or that recognizes another person as the lawful chair for the same term, counts as invalidating Lucas's election. A qualifying ruling counts when issued, even if it is later stayed, vacated, or reversed. The following do NOT satisfy the Payout Criterion: Oral rulings from the bench unless reduced to a written order Tentative rulings that are not made final Draft opinions that leak but are not officially issued Settlements or voluntary dismissals Administrative or scheduling orders Orders to show cause Minute orders that do not address the substantive issue in the specified judgment For clarity: If the case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, that counts as a ruling only if the judgment refers to jurisdiction Sua sponte rulings count if they match the specified judgment Per curiam opinions and summary orders count as rulings If multiple judges issue separate opinions, the majority/plurality opinion controls
Regels per uitkomst
- Yes
- De exacte regel voor deze uitkomst is niet beschikbaar.
- No
- De exacte regel voor deze uitkomst is niet beschikbaar.
