KalshiChiusoVerifica disponibilitàKYC richiestoDati di risoluzione verificatiBen calibratoQuesto mercato si è risolto: RC Vannes (94%)
Risolto: 24 ott 2026, 15:41
Risoluzione verificata dal provider
CoinRithm dispone di prove del provider sul vincitore e sul momento di regolamento di questo mercato.
Avviso sulla qualità dei datiDati obsoleti
Dati al 24 ott 2026, 15:41 UTC · criterio pm-quality-4
Trend
RC VannesVinta
ASM Clermont AuvergnePersa
TiePersa
Mercati Correlati
Domande correlate per il contesto, non un confronto tra contratti equivalenti.
Regole
If RC Vannes is the winner in the RC Vannes vs ASM Clermont Auvergne professional France Top 14 match originally scheduled for Oct 24, 2026 at 8:30 AM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.
- The following market refers to the RC Vannes vs ASM Clermont Auvergne professional France Top 14 rugby match originally scheduled for Oct 24, 2026 at 8:30 AM EDT. If this game is postponed or delayed, the market will remain open and close after the rescheduled game has finished (within two weeks). If the cancelled game is not played or is rescheduled further than two weeks out, the market will resolve to a fair price for each team in accordance with the rules. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
Regole per ogni esito
- RC Vannes
- If RC Vannes is the winner in the RC Vannes vs ASM Clermont Auvergne professional France Top 14 match originally scheduled for Oct 24, 2026 at 8:30 AM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.
- ASM Clermont Auvergne
- If ASM Clermont Auvergne is the winner in the RC Vannes vs ASM Clermont Auvergne professional France Top 14 match originally scheduled for Oct 24, 2026 at 8:30 AM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.
- Tie
- If tie is the result in the RC Vannes vs ASM Clermont Auvergne professional France Top 14 match originally scheduled for Oct 24, 2026 at 8:30 AM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.
