KalshiChiusoVerifica disponibilitàKYC richiestoDati di risoluzione verificatiBen calibratoQuesto mercato si è risolto: Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera (52%)
Risolto: 2 nov 2026, 21:51
Risoluzione verificata dal provider
CoinRithm dispone di prove del provider sul vincitore e sul momento di regolamento di questo mercato.
Esito Vincente
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera
A 7 giorni
—
A 24 ore
—
Avviso sulla qualità dei datiDati obsoleti
Dati al 2 nov 2026, 21:35 UTC · criterio pm-quality-4
Cronologia delle Probabilità
Henrique Rocha48%
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera52%
Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraVinta
Henrique RochaPersa
Regole
If Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera wins the Barrios Vera vs Rocha professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Costa do Sauipe Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
Si regola tramite:ATP
- The following market refers to the Barrios Vera vs Rocha professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Costa do Sauipe Round Of 32 after a ball has been played. If the match does not occur (signaled by a ball being played) due to a player injury, walkover, forfeiture, or any other cancellation (all before the match starts), the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with the rules. If this match is postponed or delayed, the market will remain open and close after the rescheduled match has finished (within two weeks). Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
Regole per ogni esito
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera
- If Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera wins the Barrios Vera vs Rocha professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Costa do Sauipe Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
- Henrique Rocha
- If Henrique Rocha wins the Barrios Vera vs Rocha professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Costa do Sauipe Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
