Qual è il prezzo attuale di Mina?
Il prezzo attuale di Mina è 0,0648 € con una variazione di 2,07% nelle ultime 24 ore.
Mina, also known as Mina Protocol, is a layer 1 blockchain designed to stay a fixed size of roughly 22 kilobytes no matter how many transactions it has processed. It achieves this with recursive zero knowledge proofs: instead of storing the full history, each new proof attests to the validity of the previous proof plus the latest block, so the entire chain collapses into a single small artifact that any device can verify in milliseconds. Applications built on it are called zkApps and are written in TypeScript using the o1js library. MINA is the network's native token, used to pay transaction fees, to stake, and to compensate the participants who produce blocks and generate proofs.
Official resources:
Development began in 2017 at O(1) Labs, a company co-founded by Evan Shapiro and Izaak Meckler. Shapiro came from a computer science background at Carnegie Mellon with experience at Mozilla; Meckler was working on cryptography at Berkeley. The project was originally called Coda Protocol. In October 2019 the enterprise blockchain firm R3 filed a trademark suit arguing that Coda was too close to its own Corda, and in September 2020 the project was renamed Mina. Mainnet launched on 23 March 2021. Later in 2021 the Mina Foundation was formed as a non-profit public benefit corporation to steward the protocol's growth and decentralization, with Shapiro moving from O(1) Labs to lead it. Development today is split between O(1) Labs, the Foundation, and independent ecosystem teams.
Two roles carry the network. Block producers are chosen for time slots under a proof of stake process and assemble pending transactions into blocks, selecting them partly by fee. Snark workers do the cryptographic labor: they generate proofs for the individual transactions in a block and then recursively merge neighboring proofs together, compressing many proofs into one. Block producers pay snark workers out of their block rewards, which creates an internal market for proof generation rather than requiring every block producer to own proving hardware.
Consensus is proof of stake. Mina's documentation describes its algorithm as a version of Ouroboros Praos, extended and modified for a succinct blockchain. One concrete modification is what the docs call the epoch ledger optimization: in a standard Ouroboros design, nodes must check a block proposer's stake against historical ledgers, but in Mina the correctness of the verifiable random function evaluation is proven inside the SNARK, so other nodes only need to verify that proof to know the block came from a legitimate slot winner. Finality is probabilistic, and the documentation notes that after fifteen blocks confidence exceeds 99.92 percent.
The practical consequence of all this is that a new participant does not sync a growing history. They download a small proof, verify it, and are current.
MINA pays transaction fees, and those fees are how block producers prioritize which transactions enter a block. It is the staked asset that secures consensus: holders either run a block producer node or delegate their stake to one, which is the more common path since delegation does not require giving up custody. Block rewards are paid in MINA, and block producers use part of that reward to buy proofs from snark workers, so the token also funds the proving market. Staking on Mina does not lock or bond tokens in the way many proof of stake networks require, which keeps delegated balances liquid, though the specifics of reward distribution are set by each block producer rather than by the protocol.
The constant size is not a marketing framing, it is the architectural centerpiece. Every other major chain grows, and that growth is what forces users onto trusted intermediaries, since running a full node eventually becomes impractical for ordinary hardware. Mina's recursive proof design means verification cost does not increase with history, so a phone or a browser can check the chain directly rather than trusting a third party's answer. The second distinctive property is programmable privacy: because zkApps execute off chain and publish only a proof, an application can prove a statement about private data without publishing the data. Writing those circuits in TypeScript rather than a specialist proving language is a deliberate accessibility choice.
Most zero knowledge projects use proofs to scale an existing chain. Rollups generate validity proofs for batches of transactions and post them to a base layer, which reduces cost but still leaves a large, growing base chain underneath. Mina applies recursion to the chain itself, so there is no growing base layer at all. Compared with privacy-first chains that make all transactions shielded, Mina's privacy is application-level and optional, arising from what a zkApp chooses to keep off chain. Compared with general smart contract platforms, the trade-off is real: proof generation is computationally expensive, and zkApp design is constrained by what can be expressed efficiently as a circuit, so Mina is not a drop-in replacement for a high throughput general purpose chain.
The strongest fit is verification without disclosure. Examples include proving eligibility, credentials or identity attributes without revealing underlying documents; proving that an off chain computation was executed correctly; and bringing attested real world data on chain in a way that consumers can verify. Lightweight verification also suits constrained environments: browsers, mobile devices and embedded clients that cannot run a conventional full node. For developers already working in TypeScript, o1js lowers the barrier to writing zero knowledge applications at all, which is why much of the ecosystem's activity has been in tooling and proof-of-concept applications rather than in high volume finance.
Security rests on proof of stake consensus combined with universal verifiability. Block producers are selected by stake and their slot eligibility is proven inside the SNARK, so a forged claim to a slot cannot pass verification. Every state transition is backed by a zero knowledge proof, which means an invalid transition cannot be accepted even by a node that has not replayed history. The documentation makes the point that because verification is cheap and universal, a single honest node is enough to prevent an adversarial group from imposing an invalid chain. The residual risks are the ones inherent to this class of system: soundness of the underlying proving system and its trusted setup assumptions, correctness of the o1js circuits an application developer writes, and stake concentration among block producers.
Proof generation is expensive, which caps throughput and makes zkApp design harder than writing an ordinary smart contract. Zero knowledge cryptography is also relatively young, and a flaw in a proving system or its parameters would be serious. The chain deliberately does not retain history, so anything requiring the past depends on archive node operators, which is an operational dependency rather than a protocol guarantee. Adoption has been slower than the technical reputation might suggest, and the zkApp ecosystem remains small relative to major smart contract platforms. Competition from rollups and other zero knowledge systems is intense and well funded. Finally, the token has an inflationary reward schedule to pay block producers, and staking returns depend on operators whose fee terms vary.
Blockchains promise that you do not have to trust anyone, but in practice most users trust an infrastructure provider because verifying independently is too expensive. Mina is one of the few designs that attacks that gap at the root rather than papering over it, by making full verification cheap enough for any device permanently. Even if the network never becomes a dominant application platform, the recursive proof architecture and the o1js developer surface have influenced how the wider industry thinks about succinctness and about writing zero knowledge applications in mainstream languages.
MINA has been listed on major centralized exchanges since around its 2021 mainnet launch, and it distributed through a CoinList sale before that, so access is broad. Because Mina is its own layer 1 with its own account model, MINA is generally traded on centralized venues rather than on decentralized exchanges, though wrapped representations exist on other networks. If you buy a wrapped version, understand that you are holding a bridge-issued claim rather than the native asset, which is a different risk. Listings and country availability change, so confirm current options with the venue you intend to use.
Native MINA needs a wallet that supports the Mina network, since it is not an ERC-20 token and Ethereum wallets will not hold it. Auro Wallet and other Mina-native wallets are the common choice, and Ledger hardware devices support Mina through a compatible interface, which keeps keys offline. Holding MINA in a self-custodied wallet also lets you delegate your stake to a block producer, which is not possible in the same way from every exchange account. Exchange custody is convenient and some exchanges offer their own staking product, but the exchange holds the keys and sets the terms. Whichever route you choose, verify the wallet's official download source, as fake wallet applications are a recurring problem across networks.
Segui il prezzo in tempo reale di Mina, il grafico, la capitalizzazione e il volume. Pratica mock trading e demo trading di Mina su CoinRithm prima di usare denaro reale.
Usa un conto di paper trading crypto per fare demo trading di Mina con prezzi in tempo reale, feedback di trading AI e leghe di trading. Testa strategie, impara la gestione del rischio e acquisisci sicurezza prima di fare trading su Mina con denaro reale.
Leggi la guida completa al paper tradingIl prezzo attuale di Mina è 0,0648 € con una variazione di 2,07% nelle ultime 24 ore.
Il volume di scambio giornaliero è 2.178.513 € rappresentando una variazione di 31,35% nelle ultime 24 ore.
La capitalizzazione di mercato di Mina è 83.827.979 €, classificandosi al #209 posto a livello globale.
La valutazione completamente diluita (FDV) di Mina è 83.827.979 €, calcolata assumendo una fornitura totale di 1.293.631.020 MINA.
In circolazione: 1.293.631.020. Totale: 1.293.631.020. Massimo: N/A.
Nelle ultime 24 ore, Mina è stato scambiato tra un minimo di 0,06146 € e un massimo di 0,06728 €.
MINA/USDTTether USDT0,07525 USDT
Coinbase will suspend trading for six pairs including MINA-EUR, CHZ-USDT, and CRO-USDT on August 6, reflecting routine exchange cleanup that may hint at.
Internet Computer ($ICP) tops most active crypto projects on GitHub, followed by $MINA, $BTC, and $LINK with strong developer contributions.
The data listed several crypto assets that are in an accumulation period, with active interest developing and greater big moves anticipated in the future.
