KalshiGeschlossenVerfügbarkeit prüfenKYC erforderlichVerifizierte AuflösungsdatenGut kalibriertDieser Markt wurde entschieden: Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera (99%)
Entschieden: 28.10.2026, 00:22
Vom Anbieter verifizierte Auflösung
CoinRithm hat anbietergestützte Nachweise für Gewinner und Auflösungszeit dieses Marktes.
Gewinnausgang
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera
7 Tage vorher
—
24 Stunden vorher
84%
KonsensWarnung zur DatenqualitätVeraltete Daten
Daten vom 28.10.2026, 02:35 UTC · Richtlinie pm-quality-4
Wahrscheinlichkeitsverlauf
Juan Estevez1%
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera99%
Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraGewonnen
Juan EstevezVerloren
Regeln
If Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera wins the Barrios Vera vs Estevez professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Guayaquil Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
Abwicklung über:ATP
- The following market refers to the Barrios Vera vs Estevez professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Guayaquil Round Of 32 after a ball has been played. If the match does not occur (signaled by a ball being played) due to a player injury, walkover, forfeiture, or any other cancellation (all before the match starts), the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with the rules. If this match is postponed or delayed, the market will remain open and close after the rescheduled match has finished (within two weeks). Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
Regeln für jedes Ergebnis
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera
- If Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera wins the Barrios Vera vs Estevez professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Guayaquil Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
- Juan Estevez
- If Juan Estevez wins the Barrios Vera vs Estevez professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Guayaquil Round Of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.