KalshiGeschlossenVerfügbarkeit prüfenKYC erforderlichVerifizierte AuflösungsdatenGut kalibriertDieser Markt wurde entschieden: Luis Felipe Miguel (91%)
Entschieden: 01.11.2026, 23:32
Vom Anbieter verifizierte Auflösung
CoinRithm hat anbietergestützte Nachweise für Gewinner und Auflösungszeit dieses Marktes.
Gewinnausgang
Luis Felipe Miguel
7 Tage vorher
—
24 Stunden vorher
—
Warnung zur DatenqualitätVeraltete Daten
Daten vom 01.11.2026, 22:51 UTC · Richtlinie pm-quality-4
Wahrscheinlichkeitsverlauf
Luis Felipe Miguel91%
Federico Zeballos10%
Luis Felipe MiguelGewonnen
Federico ZeballosVerloren
Regeln
If Luis Felipe Miguel wins the Zeballos vs Miguel professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Costa do Sauipe Qualification Round 1 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
Abwicklung über:ATP
- The following market refers to the Zeballos vs Miguel professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Costa do Sauipe Qualification Round 1 after a ball has been played. If the match does not occur (signaled by a ball being played) due to a player injury, walkover, forfeiture, or any other cancellation (all before the match starts), the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with the rules. If this match is postponed or delayed, the market will remain open and close after the rescheduled match has finished (within two weeks). Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
Regeln für jedes Ergebnis
- Luis Felipe Miguel
- If Luis Felipe Miguel wins the Zeballos vs Miguel professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Costa do Sauipe Qualification Round 1 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
- Federico Zeballos
- If Federico Zeballos wins the Zeballos vs Miguel professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Costa do Sauipe Qualification Round 1 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
